ADVISORY OPINION TO GOVERNOR

Fla. | 1941-05-21
Honorable Armstead Brown, Chief Justice, Honorable J. B. Whitfield, Honorable Glenn Terrell, Honorable R. H. Buford, Honorable R. H. Chapman, Honorable Elwyn Thomas, Honorable Alto Adams, Honorable Armstead Brown, Chief Justice, Honorable J. B. Whitfield, Honorable Glenn Terrell, Honorable R. PI. Buford, Honorable R. H. Chapman, Honorable Elwyn Thomas, Honorable Alto Adams, Armstead Brown, J. B. Whitfield, Glenn Terrell, Rivers Buford, R. H. Chapman, Elwyn Thomas Justices.
147 Fla. 148 Florida Supreme Court (1941) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 2 So. 2d 372
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Governor Holland requested an advisory opinion on whether he must submit an appointment for Assistant State Attorney to the Senate during the 1941 session. The Court held that the Governor has the constitutional duty to submit such an appointment to the Senate for the unexpired balance of a four-year term running through July 31, 1943, and that requiring Senate consent for executive appointments does not violate the Florida Constitution.


Holding

Yes, it is within the executive province of the Governor to make an appointment to the office for the unexpired term and to submit it to the Senate for its consent during the present session. The statutory requirement that the Governor appoint Assistant State Attorneys 'by and with the consent of the Senate' is constitutional and does not impair the Governor's executive power. The June 12, 1940 commission was unauthorized and did not supersede the valid June 8, 1939 appointment.


Key Quotes

“It is within the executive province of the present Governor to make an appointment to the office for the unexpired term, viz. till July 31, 1943, and to submit the appointment to the Senate for its consent thereto during the present session of the Senate.”

Establishes the Governor's constitutional duty and authority regarding the appointment submission.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

In 1939, the Governor appointed William C. Norvell, Jr. as Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit and submitted his name to the Senat…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.—

*150Per Curiam.—

State of Florida

Executive Department

Tallahassee

May 17, 1941

Spessard L. Holland, Governor

Ralph H. Davis, Executive Secretary.

Honorable Armstead Brown, Chief Justice

Honorable J. B. Whitfield

Honorable Glenn Terrell

Honorable R. H. Buford

Honorable R. H. Chapman

Honorable Elwyn Thomas

Honorable Alto Adams

Justices of the Supreme Court.

Gentlemen:

Under Section 13 of Article IV of the Constitution of Florida, I respectfully request your opinion in the question set forth below:

The Legislature of the State of Florida, in 1935, enacted Chapter 16784 by which the several offices of Assistant State Attorney were created. Pursuant to that legislative Act, the then Governor appointed, and the Senate confirmed Honorable J. C. Rogers, to be Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, from June 4, 1937, to July 31, 1939. During the 1939 session of the Legislature, the then Governor appointed to said office Honorable William C.' Norvell, Jr., and submitted his name to the Senate for confirmation, but the Senate adjourned sine die without confirmation or any other action on the appointment. On June 8, 1939, after adjournment of the Senate the then Governor appointed and commissioned Mr. Norvell to be Assistant State At*151torney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit for the period from July 31, 1939, “until the end of the next ensuing session of the Senate, unless an appointment be sooner made and confirmed by the Senate.”

Thereupon, and after July 31, 1939, an original quo warranto proceeding in the Supreme Court of Florida by the State of Florida on the relation of George Couper Gibbs, as Attorney General, was instituted against J. C. Rogers, holding the office of Assistant State Attorney on behalf of William C. Norvell, Jr., as claimant to said office. This proceeding resulted in the determination by the Supreme Court that Mr. Norvell was the rightful holder of the office of Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit and judgment was rendered accordingly.

Subsequently, on June 12, 1940, another commission was issued based on an appointment by the then Governor, to Mr. Norvell as “Assistant State Attorney in and for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, for a term of four years from the 31st day of July, A. D. 1939.”

Under the facts and circumstances stated, is it the constitutional duty of the Governor during the 1941 session of the Florida Legislature to submit to the Senate an appointment for the office of Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida for the unexpired balance of the term beginning July 31, 1939, and ending July 31, 1943?

Thanking you for giving me an advisory opinion on this question, and with much respect, I am,

Cordially yours,

Spessard L. Holland,

SLH: ed

Governor.

*152In the Supreme Court op Florida

January Term, A. D. 1941

Tallahassee, Florida, May 20, 1941

Honorable Spessard L. Holland,

Governor of Florida

Tallahassee, Florida

Dear Sir:

This advisory opinion is rendered to you under Section 13, Article IV, of the Florida Constitution, in response to your request of May 17, 1941, which is as follows:

“State of Florida

Executive Department

May 17, 1941

Honorable Armstead Brown, Chief Justice

Honorable J. B. Whitfield

Honorable Glenn Terrell

Honorable R. PI. Buford

Honorable R. H. Chapman

Honorable Elwyn Thomas

Honorable Alto Adams

Justices of the Supreme Court.

“Gentlemen:

“Under Section 13 of Article IV of the Constitution of Florida, I respectfully request your opinion on the question set forth below:

“The Legislature of the State of Florida, in 1935, enacted Chapter 16784 by which the several offices of Assistant State Attorney were created. Pursuant to that legislative Act, the then Governor appointed, and the Senate confirmed, Honorable J. C. Rogers, to be Assistant State Attorney, for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, from June 4, 1937, to July 31, 1939. During the 1939 session of the Legis*153lature, the then Governor appointed to said office Honorable William C. Norvell, Jr., and submitted his name to the Senate for confirmation, but the Senate adjorned sine die without confirmation or any other action on the appointment. On June 8, 1939, after adjournment of the Senate, the then Governor appointed and commissioned Mr. Norvell to be Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit for the period from July 31, 1939, ‘until the end of the next ensuing session of the Senate unless an appointment be sooner made and confirmed by the Senate.’

“Thereupon, and after July 31, 1939, an original quo warranto proceeding in the Supreme Court of Florida by the State of Florida on the relation of George Couper Gibbs, as Attorney General, was instituted against J. C. Rogers, holding the office of Assistant State Attorney on behalf of William C. Norvell, Jr., as claimant to said office. This proceeding resulted in the determination by the Supreme Court that Mr. Norvell was the rightful holder of the office of Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit and judgment was rendered accordingly.

“Subsequently, on June 12, 1940, another commission was issued based on an appointment by the then Governor, to Mr. Norvell as ‘Assistant State Attorney in and for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, for a term of four years from the 31st day of July, A. D. 1939.’

“Under the facts and circumstances stated, is it the constitutional duty of the Governor during the 1941 session of the Florida Legislature to submit to the Senate an appointment for the office of Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of the *154State of Florida for the unexpired balance of the term beginning July 31, 1939, and ending July 31, 1943?

“Thanking you for giving me an advisory opinion on this question, and with much respect, I am,

“Cordially yours,

“Spessard L. Holland,

“Governor.”

It appears that a four-year term in the statutory office of Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida expired July 31, 1939; and that an appointment to the office made by the Governor and by him submitted to the Senate for confirmation at its 1939 session was not acted on by the Senate before its adjournment sine die; and that after such final adjournment of the Senate the then Governor was authorized to appoint and did make an appointment to the office and the appointee was duly commissioned to hold the office “until the end of the next ensuing session of the Senate, unless an appointment be sooner made and confirmed by the Senate,” pursuant to Section 7, Article IV, of the Constitution and Sections 461 (396) and 464 (399), Compiled General Laws. See State ex rel. Gibbs v. Rogers, 141 Fla. 237, 193 So. 435; Sec. 6 Ch. 16784, Acts 1935.

The Senate being now in session, it is within the executive province of the present Governor to make an appointment to the office for the unexpired term, viz. till July 31, 1943, and to submit the appointment to the Senate for its consent thereto during the present session of the Senate.

In Section 3, Chapter 16784, Acts of 1935, it is provided: “It shall be the duty of the Governor of the State of Florida by and with the consent of the Senate *155to appoint Assistant State Attorneys in conformity with this Act.” ‘

The provision “by and with the consent of the Senate,” does not violate Section 27, Article III of the Florida Constitution, which commands that “the Legislature shall provide for the election by the people or appointment by the Governor of all State and county officers not otherwise provided for by this Constitution, and fix by law their duties and compensation.” See Thomas v. Williamson, 51 Fla. 332, 40 So. 831, headnote 9.

In creating an office to be filled by executive appointment, a provision of the statute that the appointment shall be confirmed by the Senate or that the appointment shall be made by the Governor by and with the consent of the Senate is not unconstitutional, and such provision does not unduly restrict the Governor’s discretion and judgment in exercising the executive power of appointment. See State ex rel. Buford v. Daniel, 87 Fla. 270, 99 So. 804, Headnote 2.

The Constitution requires confirmation by the Senate in some appointments of officers, and does not forbid confirmations or consent of the Senate in executive appointments of statutory officers. See Sections 15 and 27, Article V, of the Constitution; Simonton v. State, 44 Fla. 289, 31 So. 821; State v. Bird and Viney, 120 Fla. 780, 163 So. 248.

The provision of Chapter 16784, Acts of 1935, that the Governor shall “by and with the consent of the Senate” appoint Assistant State Attorneys, is not invalid and does not impair the executive power and duty of the Governor to make appointment and to submit it to the Senate for its consent.

As after the Senate adjourned sine die at the end *156of the session of 1939 without taking any action on the Executive appointment to fill the office of Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit submitted by the governor to the Senate for its consent thereto; and as the then Governor fully complied with the law in making on June 8, 1939, an appointment and issuing a commission to the appointee to fill the office until the end of the next ensuing session of the Senate unless an appointment be sooner made and confirmed by the Senate, and as it does not appear that the office became vacant, there was no authority of law for another appointment to the same office or for the issue on June 12, 1940, of another commission to the same appointee to the same office “for a term of four years from the 31st day of July, A. D. 1939.” The appointment and commission of June 12, 1940, being unauthorized, did not supersede or effect the valid appointment and commission of June 8, 1939. Nor does such appointment and commission of June ■12,-1940, affect the executive power and duty of the Governor to submit to the Senate at its present session for its consent an Executive appointment of an Assistant State Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Florida for the remainder of the four-year term of that statutory office which began July 31, 1939, and ends July 31, 1943.

Very respectfully,

Armstead Brown

J. B. Whitfield

Glenn Terrell

Rivers Buford

R. H. Chapman

Elwyn Thomas Justices.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 113 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1959)
    …ll, Justice It is our view that there is abundant precedent acknowledging the authority of the [*706] Justices to answer the question presented. See In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 147 Fla. 157, 2 So. 2d 378; In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 147 Fla. 148, 2 So. 2d 372; In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, Fla., 63 So. 2d 321. It is therefore our view that we should proceed to answe.r the question even though it involves constitutionality vel non of Chapter 59-516, Acts of 1959. As government grows…
  • State ex rel. Wynn v. Squarcia, 66 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1953)
    …e Advisory Opinion to Governor, 45 Fla. 154, 34 So. 571 (as to circuit judges and judges of criminal courts of record); In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 137 Fla. 298, 188 So. 218, 219 (as to county solicitors); In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 147 Fla. 148, 2 So. 2d 372 (as to assistant state attorneys); Advisory Opinion to Governor, 147 Fla. 157, 2 So. 2d 378 (as. to newly created offices of circuit judges in Dade County.) For the reasons stated, it must be held that the commission of the respondent…
  • In re Advisory Opinion TO the Governor, 247 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1971)
    …ory Opinion to Governor, 45 Fla. 154, 34 So. 571 (as to circuit judges and judges of criminal courts of record); [*432] In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 137 Fla. 298, 188 So. 218, 219 (as to county solicitors); In re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 147 Fla. 148, 2 So. 2d 372 (as to assistant state attorneys); Advisory Opinion to Governor, 147 Fla. 157, 2 So. 2d 378 (as to newly created offices of circuit judges in Dade County.) “For the reasons stated, it must be held that the commission of the respondent…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw