BARBARA BEGLEY, APPELLANT,

v.

CORPORATION "R", ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Carey D. Miller, 581 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …. When, however, the absence from the state is not the fault of the defendant and does not result in preventing prosecution, the time periods of statutes of limitations are not tolled. Walker v. State, 281 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 289 So. 2d 739 (Fla.1974). See also Mishan v. Crews, 363 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Fleming; Friday. The trial court, accordingly, properly dismissed the charges against the appellee, and we affirm. Affirmed. SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.…
• O'Bryan v. State, 326 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …lable at the end of his sentence does not newly imprison the accused. Our Rule therefore does not extend speedy trial benefits to a foreign prisoner until he demands those benefits. Perez v. State, 283 So. 2d 575, 576 (Fla.App.4th, 1973), cert. den. 289 So. 2d 739 (Fla.1974). A warrant filed as a detainer may nevertheless substantially prejudice a foreign prisoner by eliminating the possibility of his parole, reducing his privileges in custody, hampering his rehabilitation and increasing his sense of despair…
• Eaddy v. State, 352 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
  …ble at the end of his sentence does not newly imprison the accused. Our Rule therefore does not extend speedy trial benefits to a foreign prisoner until he demands „ those benefits. Perez v. State, 283 So. 2d 575, 576 (Fla.App.4th, 1973), cert. den. 289 So. 2d 739 (Fla.1974).” 326 So. 2d at 87-88. In obiter dicta this court stated in Stevenson v. State, 300 So. 2d 281 (Fla.4th DCA 1974), that the speedy trial time commenced with the filing of a detainer. That statement was not necessary to the decision in th…