FLORIDA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANIES ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ROBERT M. SALISBURY ET UX., APPELLEES
FLORIDA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANIES ET AL., APPELLANTS,
ROBERT M. SALISBURY ET UX., APPELLEES
290 So. 2d 73
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant brings this appeal asserting that the trial court erred in giving or refusing to give certain jury instructions.
Upon a careful review of the transcript of the conference on jury instructions and the instructions given to the jury, we hold that the appellant has failed to show reversible error. See Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App.2d 1965, 174 So. 2d 85.
Affirmed.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., BOARDMAN, J., and MAXWELL, OLIVER C., Associate Judge (Ret.), concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 954 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…. While harmful prosecutorial excesses undoubtedly require reversal, Ruiz v. State, 743 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1999), and cases cited; Gomez v. State, 751 So. 2d 630 ... (Fla. 3d DCA ... 1999), and cases cited, it is also true, as was said in Henry v. State, 290 So. 2d 73, 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), that: ‘otherwise proper trials are not to be reversed merely because an ... analysis of a single statement reveals a defect in rhetoric. When, as in this case, it clearly appears that the defendant’s substantial rights were n…
-
Whitehead v. State, 450 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…attacks had in fact occurred and that he was aware of them when he shot the victim.1 Palm v. State, 135 Fla. 258, 184 So. 881 (1938); Smith v. State, 410 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 419 So. 2d 1200 [*546] (Fla.1982); Henry v. State, 290 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), and cases cited. The other points have no merit and require no discussion. The defendant was sentenced to fifteen years subject to a three-year mandatory minimum term, pursuant to Sec. 775.087(2), Fla.Stat. (1981).2 By cross-app…
-
State v. Lewis, 543 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…our examination of the record, we find that where merited, the trial judge gave a curative instruction. We do not find that Lewis’s substantial rights were affected or that any prosecutorial comments deprived him of a fair trial. See Henry v. State, 290 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1985). Finally, in one of the paragraphs relied on by the trial court in granting a new trial, Lewis contended that it was error to allow Dishone to testify that Lewis carried a knife. The defense contended…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Henningsen v. Smith, 174 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)