CHARLES W. CRAIG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the sentence imposed was unauthorized by law and vacated it, resentencing the appellant to life imprisonment.
Appellant was convicted of rape and sentenced to 125 years. Subsequent to his conviction, the legal landscape regarding capital punishment and its imp…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unauthorized Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
DOWNEY, Judge.
We have carefully reviewed appellant’s points on appeal and find that they fail to demonstrate reversible error. However, we do notice sua sponte that the sentence imposed by the trial court is unauthorized.
Appellant was charged with the offense of rape, alleged to have occurred on August 6, 1972. He was tried and convicted on November 16, 1972, and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of one hundred and twenty-five years, and two dollars court costs.
On June 29, 1972, the Supreme Court of the United States held that several state statutes which imposed the death penalty were unconstitutional. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346. Thereafter the Supreme Court of Florida held that the Furman decision eliminated the death penalty from the Florida statutes. Donaldson v. Sack, Fla.1972, 265 So. 2d 499. In anticipation of the foregoing events, the 1972 session of the Florida Legislature amended F.S. Section 775.-082(2), F.S.A. to provide that in the event the Supreme Court of the United States or the Supreme Court of Florida declared the death penalty unconstitutional, a person convicted of a capital felony should be punished by life imprisonment. Thus, the appropriate and only sentence authorized by law for the crime of rape at the time appellant was convicted was life imprisonment. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. The sentence imposed by the trial court is vacated and the appellant is sentenced to life imprisonment.
_ . , It is so ordered.
WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hopkins v. State, 418 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…for a term of years not exceeding life imprisonment,” respectively. Appellee agreed that the appropriate sentence would be life imprisonment with the requirement that no less than 25 years be served before parole eligibility, citing Craig v. State, 290 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), and recommended that the sentence be revised to conform with Sections 775.082 and 947.16, Florida Statutes (1981). In analyzing the case and arguments of appellant, there appeared a potential problem in the application of Sect…
Authorities Cited
- Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1972)
- Donaldson v. The Honorable Martin Sack, 265 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1972)