JAMES GABLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that strict compliance with Section 801.051, Florida Statutes, is mandatory for convictions under Section 800.04, Florida Statutes.
Appellant was charged with child molesting and entered a nolo contendere plea. The trial court accepted the plea and adjudicated guilt. The conviction…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nolo Contendere Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was charged with child molesting pursuant to Section 800.04, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. A plea of nolo contendere was accepted by the trial court after a diligent inquiry to determine whether said plea was freely and voluntarily entered. Subsequently, the appellant was sentenced to serve a period of ten years in the state penitentiary upon the trial court’s adjudication of the appellant’s guilt to the charges set forth in the information.
Conviction under Section 800.04, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., brings the appellant within the purview of Chapter 801, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Baker v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1967, 194 So. 2d 687, and Baker v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1968, 206 So. 2d 441. In Wolf v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1973, 282 So. 2d 668, under substantially similar circumstances, it was established that strict compliance with Section 801.051 was mandatory.
The record in this case is devoid of any indication that Section 801.051, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., was complied with. Accordingly, under the authority of Wolf, supra, we must remand the case to the trial court for proceedings in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 801.
MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARD MAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson Vitrified China Co. v. People's Am. Nat'l Bank OF N. Miami, 388 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…31 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Siegel Trading Co., Inc. v. Coral Ridge National Bank, 328 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Keane v. Pan American Bank, 309 So. 2d 579 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Robert A. Sullivan Construction Co., Inc. v. Wilton Manors National Bank, 290 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Messeroff v. Kantor, 261 So. 2d 553 (Fla.3d DCA 1972). See generally Murray, Commercial Law, 31 U.Miami L.Rev. 895, 916- [*1061] 17 (1977); Murray, Commercial Law, 30 U.Miami L.Rev. 63, 92-93 (1975). Courts of other jurisdiction…
-
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Jefferson Nat'l Bank AT Kendall, 404 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…e banking industry and its adherence thereto. Barnett Bank of Miami Beach v. Lipp, supra; Siegel Tracking Co., Inc. v. Coral Ridge National Bank, 328 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Robert A. Sullivan Construction Co. v. Wilton Manors National Bank, 290 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). This will necessitate more than merely demonstrating that the bank “did not fail to reasonably comply with its own commercial standards.” Siegel Trading Co., Inc. v. Coral Ridge National Bank, supra, at 479. Whether GAC’s conduc…
-
Siegel Trading Co., Inc. v. Coral Ridge Nat'l Bank, 328 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)…nds that the defense of payment in good faith and in accordance with reasonable commercial standards as set out in Fla.Stat. § 673.419(3) is an affirmative defense, citing Robert A. Sullivan Construction Company, Inc. v. Wilton Manors National Bank, 290 So. 2d 561 (Fla.App.4th 1974) and that such affirmative defense must be set forth by the defendant in its answer or otherwise the same is waived, citing Fink v. Powsner, 108 So. 2d 324 (Fla.App.3rd 1958). We agree with these contentions but remind that there i…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 194 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
- Baker v. State, 206 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
- Wolf v. State, 282 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)