J. C. WILLIAMS, ET AL.,
v.
MRS. KIRBY WILLIAMS
J. C. WILLIAMS, ET AL.,
MRS. KIRBY WILLIAMS
147 Fla. 419
Florida Supreme Court (1941)
Caution
Also reported at: 2 So. 2d 725
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appeal brings for review decree establishing a resulting trust in favor of appellee in the title to certain described lands bought and paid for by appellee and the title to which had been taken in the name of appellant, who was the husband of appellee at the time of the purchase and when the deed was made.
*420 The decree is affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Foster v. Thornton, 131 Fla. 277, 179 Sou. 882, and authorities there cited.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 908 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2005)…was total. See Cauley v. City of Jacksonville, 403 So. 2d 379, 381 (Fla.1981); Spangler v. Fla. State Tpk. Auth., 106 So. 2d 421, 422 (Fla.1958) (holding that the state and its agencies are immune from suit); Smith v. City of Arcadia, 147 Fla. 375, 2 So. 2d 725, 728 (1941) (“The State cannot be sued ....”) (quoting Allison Realty Co. v. Graves Investment Co., 115 Fla. 48, 155 So. 745, 750 (1934)); State Road Dep’t of Fla. v. Tharp, 146 Fla. 745, 1 So. 2d 868, 869 (1941) (“[The] State cannot be sued without…
-
Pyle v. Pyle, 53 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1951)…f her own separate estate and the title is taken in the name of the husband. In such case the reason for the exception to the rule fails, and the general rule as to the presumption of a trust applies. Foster v. Thornton, supra; Williams v. Williams, 147 Fla. 419, 2 So. 2d 725. It must be held, therefore, that the ground of defendant's motion to dismiss first above mentioned was not well taken. There is likewise no merit to defendant-appellee's contention that plaintiff's bill was properly dismissed for fa…
-
Kostecos v. Johnson, 85 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1956)…l unit (the county) is not destroyed by substituting title to the land itself for the .'liens it formerly held absent legislative action so providing. ' No such action was here apparent. Under the doctrine of Smith v. City of Arcadia, 147 Fla. 375, 2 So. 2d 725, 135 A.L.R. 1458, the appellant contends for the so-called “last deed rule;” that is, that he received his new and original title subsequent to the county and therefore when his subsequently acquired deed was issued, he took a brand new title that e…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Foster v. Thornton, 131 Fla. 277 (Fla. 1937)