MIDWEST MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM SANTIESTEBAN, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, THEODORE SANTIESTEBAN, AND THEODORE SANTIESTEBAN, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mandate cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 1, 1972 (266 So. 2d 102) affirming the Summary Judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed December 12, 1973 (287 So. 2d 665) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause for entry of judgment for petitioner,
Now, therefore, It is Ordered that this court’s mandate heretofore issued in this cause on September 18, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed in this cause on August 1, 1972 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the summary judgment of the circuit court appealed herein is reversed with directions to enter judgment for the appellant. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Anderson v. Anderson, 309 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1975)…of “other factors being equal” still invokes the traditional rule for prime consideration being given the mother for custody of infants of tender years. Of course this is not a “conclusive presumption,” as observed in subsequent Goodman v. Goodman, 291 So. 2d 106 (Fla. App. 3d 1974), by the sage and sagacious Judge Norman Hendry, able jurist for 30 years. The 3rd District concluded sub judice the father should have the children under its “overall view of this record,” thereby sustaining the chancellor’s val…1 / 2
-
Perez v. Perez, 767 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. den. 388 So. 2d 1117. See also Jones v. Jones, 156 Fla. 524, 23 So. 2d 623 (1945); Brush v. Brush, 414 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Adams v. Adams, 385 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). But see Goodman v. Goodman, 291 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).... [*521] In Grumney v. Haber, 641 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), and Kelly v. Kelly, 642 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), rev. den. 651 So. 2d 1194, the District Court of Appeal, Second District, applied an even more demanding sta…
-
Antoine Izmery v. Dounia Richard Izmery, 559 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…should be in the custody of the father rather than with the mother. Even if we accepted the proposition that Haitian law on this point differs somewhat from Florida’s, see Anderson v. Anderson, 289 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Goodman v. Goodman, 291 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); but see § 61.13, Fla.Stat. (1979), a subtle distinction like this is hardly such as would justify disregarding the jurisdiction and judgment of another nation under section 61.1348. Warner v. Florida Bank & Trust Co., 160 F. 2d 7…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Midwest Mut. Ins. Co. v. Santiesteban, 287 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1973)
- Midwest Mut. Ins. Co. v. Santiesteban, 266 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)