JOHN BARNHILL, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. First S. Ins. Co., 573 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …coverage. An insurance policy cannot grant rights in one paragraph and then retract the very same right in another paragraph called an “exclusion”. Moore v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 277 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 291 So. 2d 204 (Fla.1974). The policy in this case attempts to provide coverage for certain advertising activities and then exclude those same activities. Such inconsistencies must be resolved in favor of the insured, Id. at 842, as liability limiting exclusions a…
• Triano v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 565 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Winegarden v. Peninsular Life Insurance Company, 363 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So. 2d 461 (Fla.1979); Moore v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 277 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 291 So. 2d 204 (Fla.1974). This is particularly true in interpreting exclusionary clauses, which are to be construed even more strictly than coverage clauses. Demshar v. Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc., 337 So. 2d 963 (Fla.1976); Wallach v. Rosenberg, 527 So. 2d 1386…
• United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Pruess, 394 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …ted. However, if the terms employed were ambiguous, we would perforce construe the provision strictly against the insurer and in favor of coverage. Moore v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 277 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1973), cert. denied 291 So. 2d 204 (Fla.1974). Appellant finds comfort in two cases involving identical policy provisions.1 However, we find the cases inapposite due to differing factual situations. In both cases the claimant was a “pilot renter” and the operator of the plane at the…