DOR RICH, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS MR. RICHARD SANZ BEAUTY SALON, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ET AL., RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Supreme Court denied certiorari and remanded to enforce the District Court's mandate upholding Miami Beach's ordinance, finding the litigation had concluded and further interference was improper.
The judicial process having run its course, the Court denied certiorari and remanded to enforce the District Court of Appeal's mandate upholding the City of Miami Beach ordinance without further interference.
[1] Once litigation has concluded through the judicial process and certiorari has been denied, further interference with enforcement of the mandate constitutes improper trifl…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDOR RICH, Inc., doing business as Mr. Richard Sanz Beauty Salon, challenged a City of Miami Beach ordinance. The matter had been previously decided by…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Finality Of Litigation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The background, history and proper disposition of this case is indicated in the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, 289 So. 2d 52, Third District, filed January 31, 1974, Rehearing denied February 12, 1974. The matters and things complained of in the litigation have been previously decided by the District Court of Appeal, Third District in an opinion appearing as City of Miami Beach v. Arthree, Inc., 269 So. 2d 699 (Fla.App.1972), certiorari denied by this Court, 276 So. 2d 166 (Fla.1973), certiorari denied by the Supreme Court of the United States, 414 U.S. 859, 94 S.Ct. 70, 38 L.Ed.2d 109.
The judicial process having run its course, it is past time to enforce the mandate and further interference comes close to trifling with the judicial process. There has to be a time when litigation ends, and in this cause, it is over. The trial court correctly on February 19, 1974, entered its order on the mandate adopting the decision of the District Court of Appeal dated January 31, 1974, as the judgment of the trial court and authorizing the City of Miami Beach to enforce its ordinance sub judice.
Accordingly, no conflict appearing as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A., the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, the filing of rehearing is dispensed with, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to properly enforce its mandate by whatever lawful means are necessary and without disturbance by further vexatious interference.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Duncan, 414 U.S. 859 (U.S. 1973)
- Desmarais v. Wachusett Reg'l Sch. Dist., 414 U.S. 859 (U.S. 1973)
- City OF Miami Beach v. Arthree, Inc., 269 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- French v. State, 276 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1973)
- Arthree, Inc. v. Kaskel, 276 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1973)
- City OF Miami Beach v. DOR Rich, Inc., 289 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)