JAMES C. GRIMES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Jenkins, 319 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
  …ll as sweet — Shakespeare. See Gagnon v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So. 2d 337; Knight v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So. 2d 900; Godbee v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So. 2d 441; Urquhart v. State, Fla.App.1971, 261 So. 2d 535; State v. Volk, Fla.App.1974, 291 So. 2d 643; State v. Ruggles, Fla.App.1971, 245 So. 2d 692; 48 A.L.R.3d 537, 548, supra. See also Cady v. Dombrowski, supra. The foregoing cases support the proposition that a search conducted for the purpose of making an inventory of the contents of an autom…
• Fredric Winton Altman v. State, 335 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
  …pound the car unnecessarily. Thus he cautioned enforcement officers “. . . [they] would make a grave mistake in relying excessively and unnecessarily upon inventory searches as a way around the Fourth Amendment.” In State v. Volk, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 291 So. 2d 643, the trial judge suppressed evidence produced in consequence of an inventory search of a motor vehicle. On appeal this court affirmed, finding that there was no necessity for impounding the vehicle and that such impoundment was done contrary to the…
• Mattson v. State, 328 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …g beverages. We agree with appellant that under certain circumstances, a search should be invalidated where police have impounded the vehicle in question but the record reveals no necessity for the impoundment. See State v. Volk, Fla.App. 2nd 1974, 291 So. 2d 643. In the Volk case, the trial court found that there was no necessity for impounding the vehicle in question. In the instant case, there was no such finding. Moreover, the Volk decision recognized that the police may necessarily impound a vehicle whe…

Authorities Cited

• Wingate v. State, 232 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
• James v. State, 263 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
• Johnson v. State, 140 Fla. 443 (Fla. 1939)