WILLIE JAMES WATSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIE JAMES WATSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
292 So. 2d 418
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the rationale of Manning v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1967, 203 So. 2d 360.
McNULTY, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pub. Health Tr. v. Brown, 388 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…s specifically reserved in Jackson v. Anderson, 230 So. 2d 503 (Fla.2d DCA 1970), which was the first Florida decision to recognize the right to recover for a negligent sterilization which does not achieve the desired result. Cf., Aronoff v. Snider, 292 So. 2d 418 (Fla.2d DCA 1974) (no cause of action in siblings of “wrongfully bom” child). In Bradian v. Baliton, 48 Fla.Supp. 201 (Fla. 19th Cir. Ct. 1979), a Florida trial court struck the damage element involved in this case. . Mrs. Brown stated that Lamont,…
-
Moores v. Charles S. Lucas, M.D., 405 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…have recognized a cause of action arising from a failed sterilization or abortion. Public Health Trust v. Brown, 388 So. 2d 1084 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); The Ladies’ Center of Clearwater, Inc. v. Reno, 341 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Aronoff v. Snider, 292 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Jackson v. Anderson, 230 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). There is no Florida decision addressing the issue of whether or not this state recognizes a claim for wrongful birth in a case arising from the failure to diagnose and/or wa…
-
Bradian v. Baliton, 48 Fla. Supp. 201 (St. Lucie Cty. Cir. Ct. 1979)…blings to the unplanned child, damages for the diminishment of each child’s portion of the care, affection and training which allegedly has occurred because the children have acquired a baby sister. No such cause of action exists. Aronoff v. Smider, 292 So. 2d 418 (2nd Dist. 1974). Therefore, Count III is stricken and dismissed in its entirety. That part of paragraph 5, contained in Count IV which reads, “And has further lost the income from the beauty parlor which she does not have the time to operate since…
Authorities Cited
- Manning v. State, 203 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)