STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
LAWRENCE THOMAS NIEMAN AND THEODORE CLEVENGER, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
The State appeals an order suppressing certain tangible evidence seized following a warrantless search of an automobile which had been driven by appellee-Nieman. We conclude that on the basis of the information then known to the officers conducting the search, coupled with the surrounding circumstances, the officers had probable cause to believe that the automobile contained contraband and thus the search was not illegal. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; State v. Miller, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 352; State v. Sanders, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So. 2d 120.
The order granting the motion to suppress is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Glatstein v. The City OF Miami, 391 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…urt for that purpose. Leo Goodwin Foundation, Inc. v. Riggs National Bank of Washington, D. C., 374 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) 1; Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Watson, 341 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Hardwicke Companies, Incorporated v. Freed, 292 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Hutchison v. Wintrode, 286 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). The trial court’s order denying appellants’ Rule 1.540(b) motion is affirmed without prejudice to appellants renewing the motion in the trial court when their appeal fro…
-
Hardwicke Cos. v. Freed, 299 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)…*119] judge exercised his sound discretion in determining that the settlement was fair and reasonable. Accordingly, the decision of the trial judge is hereby Affirmed. MANN, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur. . Hardwicke v. Freed, Fla.App.2nd, 1974, 292 So. 2d 610. . Heddendorf v. Goldfine, 167 F.Supp. 915 (D.Mass.1958). . Manacher v. Reynolds, 39 D.Ch. 401, 165 A. 2d 741 (1960): . In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co., 196 F. 2d 484 (7 Cir. 1952); Norman v. McKee, 290 F.Supp. 29 (N.D.Cal.1968), aff’d. 431 F. 2d…
-
Analyte Diagnostics, Inc. v. D'Angelo, 792 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…uish jurisdiction cannot be considered a decision on the merits of the claim for which relinquishment is sought. See State v. Meneses, 392 So. 2d 905 (Fla.1981); Glatstein v. City of Miami, 391 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Hardwicke Cos. v. Freed, 292 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Therefore, it is apparent that the merits of the issues raised in the motion to vacate were never considered by this court; hence, the per curiam affirmance of the final judgment does not bar the trial court’s consideration of th…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (U.S. 1925)
- State v. Miller, 267 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
- State v. Sanders, 239 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)