BILLY D. BRACKEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1974-04-18
No. U-316
RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
293 So. 2d 108 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Williams v. State, Fla.App., 259 So. 2d 753.

RAWLS, C. J., and McCORD and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Angell Rogers v. State, 336 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
    …nded the cause “with directions to [*1236] quash the information with leave either to amend or to refile in the appropriate court depending upon the allegations upon which the state intends to rely . . .” 268 So. 2d at 176. See, too, Brack v. State, 293 So. 2d 108 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). We hold that the first information the state filed was as invalid as the one in the Pope case because it too failed to show whether the appellant was charged with a misdemeanor or a felony. On the one hand the first part of the i…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw