HOWARD M. SHARP, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY JO SHARP HIXON, APPELLEE
HOWARD M. SHARP, APPELLANT,
MARY JO SHARP HIXON, APPELLEE
293 So. 2d 113
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
MANN, Chief Judge.
Sharp appeals an order amending a final judgment of divorce in such a way as adversely to affect his right of visitation with his children. We find the modification unsupported by any proof of changed circumstances warranting the court’s granting of a petition for modification.
Reversed and remanded.
BOARDMAN, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Waszkowski v. Waszkowski, 367 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…e v. Frye, 205 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 166 So. 2d 591 (Fla.1964). I think therefore that, as in such cases as Jacobs v. Ross, 304 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Sharp v. Hixon, 293 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); and McManus v. McManus, 238 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970), the modification should not be permitted to stand.…
-
Davis v. Leonard and Ardella Dixon, 604 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…, cert. denied, 263 So. 2d 831 (Fla.1972); cf. also Vannucci v. Vannucci, 546 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (sexual abuse of child sufficient reason to restrict visitation). For these reasons, the order under review is reversed. See Sharp v. Hixon, 293 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Reversed and remanded. . Our conclusion makes it unnecessary to address the appellants’ contentions regarding the application of sections 752.01, 752.015, Florida Statutes (1991). . Compare Saenz v. Saenz, 602 So. 2d 973 (Fla.…