WALKER-SKAGSETH FOOD STORES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION,
v.
NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, A CORPORATION

Fla. | 1941-09-16
Brown, C. J., Terrell, Chapman, and Thomas, J. J., concur.
148 Fla. 161 Florida Supreme Court (1941) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 3 So. 2d 756
Cited by 12 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that dismissal of a writ of error for failure to pay accrued costs was error when the costs were paid before the motion to dismiss and the opposing party stipulated to matters related to the bill of exceptions.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought a writ of error, but the Circuit Court dismissed it for failure to pay accrued costs. All costs were paid before the motion to dismi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Petitioner seeks to have reviewed and quashed a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County dismissing a writ of error prosecuted to it from the Civil Court of Record because of failure of petitioner to pay costs which had accrued in the cause as required by the statute.

The statute, Sec. 4618, Comp. Gen. Laws of 1927, requires that the accrued costs be paid before the writ of error is granted, but it is not made a jurisdictional prerequisite to granting the writ of error. Sec. 5168, (3) and (11) Perm. Supp., Comp. Gen. Laws of 1927, relating to writs of error from the Civil Courts of Record to the Circuit Courts in appropriate language adopts the provisions of Sec. 4618, Comp. Gen. Laws of 1927, with reference to costs.

In Haile v. Mason Hotel and Investment Company, 71 Fla. 469, 71 So. 540, this Court held that the *163statute requiring all accrued costs to be paid before taking a writ of error was for the benefit of the defendant and might be waived but if not done, it was an indispensible prerequisite to the right to demand a writ of error and when not complied with, the writ of error may be dismissed.

In this case, it appears that all costs were paid when the writ of error was sued out except such as were assessed in the final judgment and this was paid before the motion to dismiss was considered. It furthur appears that counsel for defendant signed a stipulation with reference to preparation of the bill of exceptions and did not move to dismiss for forty-seven days after the writ of error was sued out. For these reasons, we think it was error to dismiss, the writ of error.

The writ of certiorari is accordingly granted and the judgment of the Circuit Court is quashed.

It is so ordered.

Brown, C. J., Terrell, Chapman, and Thomas, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Berg v. NEW York Life Ins. Co., 81 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 1955)
    …after a reconsideration of all the cases on the point, that the phrase “jurisdictional requirement” was too loosely used with respect to the issue then before the court for decision. Walker-Skagseth Food Stores, Inc., v. National Surety Corporation, 148 Fla. 161, 3 So. 2d 756. In the instant case, the notice of appeal, the assignments of error, and the appellant’s directions to the clerk for making up the transcript of record, were filed on January 17, 1955. On January 26, 1955, the .appellee filed directi…
  • Simmons v. Gainesville Nehi Bottling Co., 119 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)
    …90 So. 619; Smith v. Dillard, 84 Fla. 516, 94 So. 664; Busch v. Goodno, 99 Fla. 517, 128 So. 825. We recognize that under the statute payment of costs was not a jurisdictional prerequisite (Walker-Skagseth Food Stores v. National Surety Corporation, 148 Fla. 161, 3 So. 2d 756) nor do we think such is the case under the rule. We are also aware of and do not depart from the case law holding that the defendant may waive the requirement cast on the original plaintiff under the rule, or by his conduct become est…
  • Ogier v. John H. Swisher & Sons, Inc., 133 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)
    …al. v. Bethea et al., 160 Fla. 99, 33 So. 2d 638; Gordon and wife v. Camp, 2 Fla. 23; Union Bank of Florida, etc. v. McBride, 2 Fla. 7. . MacNeill v. Marks et ux., Fla.1952, 61 Sc.2d 648; Walker-Skagseth Food Stores, Inc. v. National Surety Corp., 148 Fla. 161, 3 So. 2d 756; Callison v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 82 Fla. 516, 90 So. 619. . Funke v. Federal Trust Co., Fla.App. 1958, 99 So. 2d 636; Walker v. City of Jacksonville, 154 Fla. 893, 19 So. 2d 372. . Bredin v. Bredin, Fla.1959, 111 So. 2d…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw