LONNIE A. MARION, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1974-04-22
No. 44938
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
294 So. 2d 91 Florida Supreme Court (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court

Certiorari denied. 287 So. 2d 419.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Casper, 417 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
    …endant is charged, is ordinarily admissible to rebut a defense of entrapment. See, e.g., Drayton v. State, 292 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974), cert. denied 300 So. 2d 900 (Fla.1974); Marion v. State, 287 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. denied, 294 So. 2d 91 (Fla.1974). Upon this record, we are unable to find any evidence which would tend to show predisposition so as to defeat a motion to dismiss under Rule 3.190(c)(4), and the State did not traverse the facts as stated in defendant’s motion. There is n…
  • Travers v. State, 578 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …228 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So. 2d 540 (Fla.1970); Davis v. State, 276 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), affirmed, State v. Davis, 290 So. 2d 30 (Fla.1974); and cf., Marion v. State, 287 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 294 So. 2d 91 (Fla.1974) (not fundamental error under circumstances, where limiting instruction was given). The court in Davis v. State, supra, recognized the error as fundamental although not raised in the defendant’s brief on appeal. See also, Dydek v. State, 4…
  • State v. Thaddeus Tyrone Holliday, 431 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …endant is charged, is ordinarily admissible to rebut a defense of entrapment. See, e.g., Drayton v. State, 292 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974), cert. denied 300 So. 2d 900 (Fla.1974); Marion v. State, 287 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. denied, 294 So. 2d 91 (Fla.1974). Upon this record, we are unable to find any evidence which would tend to show predisposition so as to defeat a motion to dismiss under Rule 3.190(c)(4), and the State did not traverse the facts as stated in defendant’s motion. There is n…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw