DR. B. L. STALNAKER, M.D., DR. FRANK J. GRESKOVICH, D.D.S., INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AND D/B/A G & S ENTERPRISES, APPELLANTS,

v.

THEODORE NECKLES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Kalmutz v. Kalmutz, 299 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
  …and the standards established by himself during the marriage. Royal v. Royal, Fla.App.1972, 263 So. 2d 277; but see Steinhauer v. Steinhauer, Fla.App.1971, 252 So. 2d 825; Rey v. Rey, Fla.App.1973, 279 So. 2d 360; Hanzelik v. Hanzelik, Fla.App.1974, 294 So. 2d 116; Yohem v. Yohem, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 295 So. 2d 656, opinion filed June 7, 1974. As a general principle an alimony award may be modified where there has been a showing of a substantial change m the circumstances of the parties; for exa…
• Bucci v. Bucci, 350 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …it was held that a jointly held domicile ought to be divided equally between the partners with the wife’s and the husband’s financial contribution to acquisition of the property to be considered as gifts to each other. Also cf. Hanzelik v. Hanzelik, 294 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Our holding is that in the present case the record does not support the award of the marital residence to the wife either because of a special equity or because of a need for lump sum alimony. Following the final judgment, the…
• Tiffany v. Tiffany, 305 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
  …, 282 So. 2d 665; F.S.A. § 689.15. Appellee on the other hand alleged that she did not intend to make a gift to appellant. The burden of proof is upon the wife in this case to overcome the presumption of a gift. Hanzelik v. Hanzelik, Fla. App.1974, 294 So. 2d 116. This she has failed to do. Appellee testified concerning the first home in Broward County as follows : “Q. (By Mr. Moss) When the deed was first prepared at the completion of the house, whose name was the house titled in? A. Well, at first it was…

Authorities Cited

• Brown v. State, 257 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
• Lakeport Water Ass'n, Inc. v. David B. Smith Eng'rs, Inc., 257 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)