FLEMMIE BIRKINS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
An appeal was timely filed on behalf of the appellant by the public defender. After reviewing the facts contained m the record, the public defender states in his brief that he concludes the appellant lacks meritorious grounds for appeal. Consequently the public defender seeks to be relieved as attorney of record for appellant under the rationale of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493. The appellant was advised of the public defender’s position and given an opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.
We have carefully examined the entire record on file and find nothing therein to. justify a reversal. We do note that the appellant was found guilty by the jury of assault with intent to commit a felony, to wit: robbery, yet the judgment entered by the trial judge reflects a finding of guilty of the crime of robbery. Accordingly, we direct that the trial judge enter an amended judgment setting forth the crime of which the jury found the appellant guilty.
In all other respects the judgment of the trial court is
Affirmed.
HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
White v. White, 306 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)…ss the record, by one of the methods provided by the Florida Appellate Rules, reveals all evidence and proceedings which were before the trial court which are material to a resolution of the points on appeal. (Merritt v. Williams, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 295 So. 2d 310 and cases therein-cited.) The law is equally well settled that the findings and judgment of the trial court come to us clothed with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed upon appeal in the absence of a record demonstrating errors of…
-
Horton v. Horton, 330 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…e have held that an appellate court may not consider a case unless the record reveals all evidence and proceedings which were before the trial court which are material to a resolution of the points on appeal. (Merritt v. Williams, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 295 So. 2d 310; White v. White, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 306 So. 2d 608) As there is no transcript of the hearing below bearing on the issue of the interpretation of paragraph seven of the final judgment of divorce I am of the view that this Court is unable to make a me…
-
Valladares v. Junco-Valladares, 30 So. 3d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…proceedings is abuse of discretion. “The findings and judgment of the trial court come to us clothed with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed upon appeal in the absence of a record demonstrating errors of law.” Merritt v. Williams, 295 So. 2d 310, 311 (Fla. 1st [*523] DCA 1974). Beyond this deferential standard of review, the husband in the instant action is disadvantaged because he represented himself pro se at trial and failed to preserve issues that he now appeals. Dade County School Bd.…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)