SIDNEY TILLMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SIDNEY TILLMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
295 So. 2d 338
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Scarborough v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1973, 278 So. 2d 657; Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1969, 228 So. 2d 446.
MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Esaw Jones v. State, 343 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…anch v. State, 212 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). We do not feel that the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to allow questions to the prospective jurors concerning their ability to apply particular propositions of law. See Price v. State, 295 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); see also Barker v. Randolph, 239 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Mizell v. New Kingsley Beach, Inc., 122 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). Defendant’s remaining points on appeal are without merit. Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Steinhauser v. State, 228 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
- Artis Scarborough v. State, 278 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)