A. W. SPRIGG, C. J. SPRIGG AND CYNTHIA SPRIGG
v.
MAE E. DIX, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, R. S. DIX, AS NEXT FRIEND
A. W. SPRIGG, C. J. SPRIGG AND CYNTHIA SPRIGG
MAE E. DIX, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, R. S. DIX, AS NEXT FRIEND
149 Fla. 538
Florida Supreme Court (1942)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 6 So. 2d 533 · 148 Fla. 649
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said final decree of the Circuit Court, be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gen. Cap. Corp. v. TEL Serv. Co., Inc., 212 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)…llate court does not seek to reevaluate the facts in opposition to the determination of the lower court. A trial judge has the same power that a jury has on disputed questions of fact. See Hill v. Beacham, 79 Fla. 430, 85 So. 147; Joyner v. Bernard, 148 Fla. 649, 6 So. 2d 533; Goldfarb v. Robertson, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 504.” On the matter of the affirmative defenses pleaded by GC, they can be disposed of in short order. As for unclean hands and estoppel, it has been repeatedly held in Florida that the stat…
-
Joyner v. Bernard, 153 Fla. 372 (Fla. 1943)…Certain phases of the case at bar were considered and decided by this Court in the former appeal. See Joyner v. Bernard, 148 Fla. 649, 6 So. (2nd) 533. On petition for rehearing on the former appeal we said: “On petition for rehearing, it is urged that the Court overlooked important considerations in reference to each question adjudicated. We are not impressed with any of these c…
-
Cutri Enters., Inc. v. PAN Am. Bank OF Miami, 115 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)…s not seek to re-evaluate the facts in opposition to the determination of the lower court. A trial judge has the same power that a jury has on disputed questions of fact. See Hill v. Beacham, 79 Fla. 430, 85 So. 147; Joyner v. Bernard, 148 Fla. 649, 6 So. 2d 533; Goldfarb v. Robertson, Fla. 1955, 82 So. 2d 504. This court held in Shaffran v. Holness, supra, that usury, as a defense, must be proved by clear and satisfactory evidence; that the burden of proof is on the party asserting usury; that where one n…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence