VIVIAN L-L. BLUE, A WIDOW ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
OLIVER H. BEAHRS, APPELLEE
VIVIAN L-L. BLUE, A WIDOW ET AL., APPELLANTS,
OLIVER H. BEAHRS, APPELLEE
297 So. 2d 335
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek reversal of a final summary judgment ordering them to specifically perform an agreement for deed.
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final summary judgment appealed herein is affirmed.
SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edmond Duhart v. State, 348 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Lattimore v. State, 323 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); United States v. Jones, 457 F. 2d 697 (5th Cir. 1972); Chaney v. State, 267 So. 2d 65 (Fla.1972); Hanks v. State, 305 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and compare Cribbs v. State, 297 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).…
-
State v. Ciongoli, 313 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)…ously taken the same position, see Perkins v. State, 228 So. 2d 382 (Fla.1969), and Robinson v. State, 237 So. 2d 268 (4th DCA Fla.1970). . Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441. . The trial judge in Cribbs v. State, 297 So. 2d 335 (2d DCA Fla.1974), found a line-up im-permissibly suggestive and suppressed the line-up but not the in-court identification. In vacating judgment the Second District Court of Appeal held this to be a misunderstanding of Wade and specifically decline…
-
State v. Sepulvado, 362 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)…ust be considered to determine if the witness’ in-court identification is grounded upon a basis independent of the suggestive pretrial procedure. Simmons v. United States, supra; Hamilton v. State, 303 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Cribbs v. State, 297 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 303 So. 2d 335 (Fla.1974). However, once a trial court determines that a pretrial identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive, it is presumed that any in-court identification will be tainted. It is the state’s…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence