WILLIE LEE DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Indigent Defendants cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of .the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lehman-Eastern Auto Rentals, Inc. v. Brooks, 370 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…ter would be an insured under Lehman-Eastern’s policy only if the renter has no other valid and collectible automobile liability insurance. We must reject this argument based upon the authorities cited in Executive Rent-A-Car, [*16] Inc. v. Uditsky, 297 So. 2d 340 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 310 So. 2d 742 (Fla.1975) holding such clauses invalid. Pan American next argues that its liability is limited to $10,000, the minimum amount required under the Florida Financial Responsibility Law. We find this poi…
-
Diversified Servs., Inc. v. Jackson, 330 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…ere also contrary to public policy and void; and (3) Diversified was not entitled to indemnity from Lopez for any amount. Diversified and Pan American conceded that under this court’s decision in Executive Rent-a-Car, Inc. v. Uditsky, Fla.App. 1974, 297 So. 2d 340, cert. denied, Fla., 310 So. 2d 742 the contingent insurance clause was invalid. However, as to arguments two and three above, they contended to the contrary. After the conclusion of the hearing, the trial judge entered final judgment which reads in…
-
Am. Bankers Ins. Co. OF Fla. & Olin's Miami Rent A Car, Inc. v. Leatherby Ins. Co. & Julio Gonzalez, 350 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)…iversified Services, Inc. v. Jackson, 330 So. 2d 830 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). As in the instant case, the driver’s policy contained the typical excess clause. The court first observed that in its previous decision of Executive Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Uditsky, 297 So. 2d 340 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), the contingent insurance clause had been ruled invalid. The court went on to say that because that clause was invalid, [*356] the limitation of coverage to the amount specified by the financial responsibility law was also invalid.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)