FRANCES STARNES, PETITIONER,
v.
SIMONSENS RESTAURANT ET AL., RESPONDENTS
FRANCES STARNES, PETITIONER,
SIMONSENS RESTAURANT ET AL., RESPONDENTS
297 So. 2d 571
Florida Supreme Court (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Petition denied.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. Lake Worth Inlet Dist. v. Town OF Ocean Ridge, 633 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…urisdiction,” and pointing out that this is not “simply a matter of discretion in the sense that a trial judge may invoke or not as he thinks propitious.” See State ex rel. Shevin v. Tampa Electric Co., 291 So. 2d 45, 46 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 297 So. 2d 571 (Fla.1974). Its motion was also turned aside without explanation. In short, there can be no serious contention that the question of administrative jurisdiction and remedies was not timely raised below and a ruling had. Nevertheless while recognizin…
-
Humana OF Fla., Inc. v. Jaimes McKAUGHAN and Darlene McKaughan, 652 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…eurological injury.’ ” II. DOCTRINE OF PRIMARY JURISDICTION A different conclusion is not compelled by the doctrine of primary jurisdiction. We explained in State ex rel. Shevin v. Tampa Electric Co., 291 So. 2d 45, 47 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 297 So. 2d 571 (Fla.1974), that: [I]f in a given ease the operative conclusion to be reached by the court is one of ultimate fact, or of law which in turn is dependent upon the existence of highly technical or specialized criteria peculiarly within the expertise…