LINDA M. MCCONNELL, APPELLANT,

v.

BRUMOS PORSCHE AUDI CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …ee generally Iljazi v. Iljazi, 436 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Stearns v. Szikney, 386 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Berlin v. Berlin, 386 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Stricklin v. Stricklin, 383 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Teta v. Teta, 297 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Wilson v. Condra, 255 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971); Bennett v. Bennett, 73 So. 2d 274 (Fla.1954). In satisfying this burden, it is essential that the movant rely only on changes occurring after entry of the original final judg…
• Smithwick v. Smithwick, 343 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …with this statement of the law, but contends that under certain compelling or extraordinary circumstances, the trial court would be justified in refusing to enforce the payment of past due installments against a defaulting spouse. See Teta v. Teta, 297 So. 2d 642, 645 (Fla.1st DCA 1974). The record does not reflect that this case falls within the above exception and we hold that the trial judge erred in failing to enter judgment in Sally’s favor for the arrearag-es in alimony. We also find error in the tria…
• Patterson v. Patterson, 348 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …they constitute a vested right not subject to modification. However, in some cases there may be extra [*595] ordinary facts justifying a refusal to enforce against the defaulting party payment of past due installments of child support. Teta v. Teta, 297 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Further, in order for the right to vest the payments must be due. If there is no obligation to pay, or if the obligation ceases, then the payments do not become due. In particular, contempt proceedings as a method of enforcing p…