JOHN DAVID RANKIN, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 1974-07-16
No. W-52
RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
297 So. 2d 647 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, in proper person, has filed herein a petition for writ of habeas corpus. This is the fifth time that this case has appeared before this Court. In 1964 the Public Defender initiated a direct appeal on behalf of the petitioner herein. Since that time three petitions for writs of habeas corpus have been filed in the Court by the petitioner herein all of which have been denied. Petitioner has now filed a fourth petition for writ of habeas corpus. Our examination of the present petition convinces us that it should be disposed of in the same manner as the three prior petitions. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed herein on May 31, 1974 is hereby denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Grisham v. State, 319 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
    …edy trial, such denial is a nonjurisdictional defect that is waived by the entry of an otherwise valid guilty plea citing Fowler v. United States, 391 F. 2d 276 (5th Cir. 1968); White v. State, 273 So. 2d 782 (Fla.App. 2nd 1973); and Wells v. State, 297 So. 2d 647 (Fla.App. 1st 1974). It last concludes that since the “nolo contendere” plea was equivalent to a guilty plea that the speedy trial claim was waived when that plea was tendered and accepted by the trial judge. F.S. 917.16, upon which appellant heavi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw