ROBERT HUCKEBA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1974-08-07
No. 73-947
MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
299 So. 2d 104 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s second point on appeal is identical to the point raised on appeal in Johnson v. State, 297 So. 2d 35, opinion filed in this court on June 26, 1974. In Johnson, supra, we certified the question to our Supreme Court as a matter of great public interest. We therefore certify in the case sub jud-ice the same question as was certified in Johnson, supra.

The other points on appeal have been carefully considered and found to be without merit.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In re Adoption By Charles W. COX, Sr., 327 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 1976)
    …ENGLAND, Justice. Our jurisdiction under Article V, § 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution is invoked to review a direct conflict between the decision below, reported at Fla.App., 299 So. 2d 104, and that rendered in Ptigh v. Barwick. Our review of the case also discloses conflict with the decision in In Re Stonehouse’s Adoption Certiorari is granted. This proceeding arose when Charles and Patricia Cox endeavored to adopt the natural dau…
  • Huckeba v. State, 322 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 1975)
    …PER CURIAM. This cause is before us on a petition for writ of certiorari, supported by certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, that its decision in Huckeba v. State, 299 So. 2d 104 (Fla.App.2d 1974), is one which involves a question of great public interest. Petitioner was informed against for grand larceny. He pled not guilty, but was found guilty by the jury, and was sentenced to five years. The trial court denied the petit…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw