WILLIAM C. HARTLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1974-07-26
No. 73-734
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
299 So. 2d 108 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record and the appellate presentation. We are satisfied that the principles contained in Hoffman v. Jones, 280 So. 2d 431 (Fla.1973), are not applicable here for the reason that the matter of comparative negligence was not appropriately and properly raised during some stage of the litigation and neither was it properly and appropriately made a question of appellate review. Hoffman, v. Jones, supra. Next, we are satisfied that a correct assessment of the evidence adduced supports the trial court decision that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Thus, the decision to grant a directed verdict for the defendant is affirmed. Loftin v. McGregor, 152 Fla. 813, 14 So. 2d 574 (1943); Lindsey v. Seaboard Coastline RR. Co., 248 So. 2d 518 (Fla.App.1st 1971); Knott v. Seaboard Air Line RR. Co., 151 So. 2d 11 (Fla.App.3d 1963).

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hartley v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 339 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 1976)
    …OVERTON, Chief Justice. This is a petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported at 299 So. 2d 108. The decision conflicts with Fitzsimmons v. City of Pensacola, 297 So. 2d 107 (Fla.App. 1st 1974). We have jurisdiction.1 In the instant case, the Fourth District held the initial assertion of the doctrine of comparative negligence in plaintiff’s a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw