LELAND WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• McNAMARA v. State, 357 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1978)
  …ent in the instant cause, the officers had probable cause sufficient to justify the frisking of appellant for their own safety. Cf. Wilson v. State, 324 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), Williams v. State, 294 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974), cert. den. 299 So. 2d 602 (Fla.1974), State v. Brooks, 281 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), State v. Woodard, 280 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973).- In determining the reasonableness of the governmental search of a citizen’s person, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Terry…
• Moore v. Taylor Concrete & Supply Co., Inc., 553 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …. [*791] Moreover, in some circumstances the error has been deemed so harmful that a new trial was warranted even though the objecting party failed to move for a mistrial. For example, in Albertson v. Stark, 294 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 4th DCA), dismissed, 299 So. 2d 602 (Fla.1974), during defense counsel’s argument to the jury, he told jurors that the defendant had not been charged with the accident. Appellant’s counsel moved the trial court to strike the argument and to instruct the jury to disregard it, which mot…
• Budget Rent A CAR Sys., Inc. v. Jana, 600 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …ued will require that a mistrial be granted or that there be reversal on appeal. Royal Indem. v. Muscato, 305 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), cert. denied, 321 So. 2d 76 (Fla.1975); Albertson v. Stark, 294 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. dismissed, 299 So. 2d 602 (Fla.1974). We do not agree with the appellees that the directed verdict in their favor as to negligence would remove the prejudice caused by the elicited testimony. We are also not convinced that the non-personal nature of the testimony concerning…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. State, 294 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)