ROBERT BENEDICT AND PATRICIA JUNOD, CO-GUARDIANS OF THE PERSON OF KENNETH P. FOSTER, INCOMPETENT, PETITIONERS,
v.
VIRGINIA FOSTER AND SUSAN SEILER, RESPONDENTS; ROBERT BENEDICT AND PATRICIA JUNOD, AS CO-GUARDIANS OF THE PERSON OF KENNETH P. FOSTER, INCOMPETENT, PETITIONERS, V. THE HONORABLE PAUL T. DOUGLAS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROBATE DIVISION, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court's judgment is joined, specifically the holding that the complaint failed to satisfy the constitutional threshold requirement of an actual case or controversy.
[1] A court that first assumes jurisdiction over a guardianship matter has the power to proceed to the exclusion of any other court to avoid multiple legal proceedings.
[2] Proceedings concerning an incompetent person and their estate should be conducted in the circuit court of the county where the incompetent was a long-time resident and wh…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis is a concurring opinion discussing the procedural posture of a case where the complaint allegedly failed to meet the constitutional requirement o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adjudication Of Incompetency cases and more on FLexlaw
OVERTON, Justice.
This is before the Court upon a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 and Petition for Writ of Certiorari.2 It concerns a dispute over who is to be the guardian of the person of the incompetent, Kenneth P. Foster, and which Circuit Court has supervision of the incompetent and his estate.
The problem is accentuated by numerous legal proceedings in the Circuit Courts of the Fifteenth and Seventeenth Circuits, a petition for writ of prohibition to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and petitions for habeas corpus and certiorari to this Court. The situation is characterized as a mass of legal spaghetti for this Court to untangle.
The chronology of events puts the issue in better perspective and they are as follows :
(1) On October 3, 1972, the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, adjudicated Kenneth P. Foster incompetent, and said court appointed Virginia Foster, his wife, and the First National Bank and Trust Company of Riviera Beach as co-guardians of his substantial property;
(2) From October 3, 1972, to November 19, 1973, the incompetent was physically cared for by his wife, Virginia, and his daughter, Susan Seiler;
(3) On November 19, 1973, the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County committed the incompetent to South Florida State Hospital in Broward County, Florida, for care and treatment;
(4) On February 21, 1974, the staff in the hospital determined that the incompetent had reached maximum benefits obtainable at that facility and desired to discharge him;
(5) On March 29, 1974, petition for writ of habeas corpus was initiated by Patricia Junod in the Probate Division of the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. At the hearing on the writ of habeas corpus, counsel for Mrs. Junod presented to the court a petition for appointment as guardian of the person over the objection of the wife, Virginia Foster. Notice of the hearing on the petition for appointment as guardian of the person was given to the incompetent’s mother but not to the wife and co-guardian of the property of the incompetent under the order of the Palm Beach County Circuit Court. The Broward County Circuit Court granted the writ of habeas corpus and appointed the petitioners in this Court, Patricia Junod and Robert Benedict, who are unrelated to the incompetent, as guardians of the person of the incompetent, Kenneth P. Foster. (6) On April 2, 1974, Virginia Foster and Susan F. Seiler, wife and daughter respectively of the incompetent, petitioned the Palm Beach County Circuit Court for appointment as guardian of the person of Kenneth P. Foster, incompetent.
(7) Petitioners Junod and Benedict sought a writ of prohibition directed to the Judge of the Palm Beach County Circuit Court from proceeding with the hearing in said cause, which was denied on April 8, 1974, by the Fourth District Court of Appeal.
(8) On May 2, 1974, the Circuit Court in Palm Beach County considered a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by the incompetent’s wife and daughter and released the incompetent from the custody of Patricia Junod and Robert Benedict and granted temporary custody of said incompetent to his daughter, Susan Seiler. Said order also construed the order of the Broward County Circuit Court as void because of failure of notice to indispensable parties.
(9) The Palm Beach County Circuit Judge further found in said order that these proceedings were “nothing more than a tug-of-war to obtain physical possession between Patricia Junod, former business associate and girl friend of Mr. Foster, and Virginia Foster, wife of Mr. Foster” and concluded that there was much unnecessary litigation, none of which concerned nor benefited the ultimate welfare of the incompetent.
This Court has previously determined that where county judges of two different counties had the power to act over the subject matter, the question was one of proper venue,3 and where one county has assumed jurisdiction over the subject matter, the action of another judge in another county over the same subject matter would not affect the jurisdiction of the court which had first taken jurisdiction.4 Although both courts in this cause had jurisdiction, the court which first accepts jurisdiction over the subject matter must have the power to proceed to the exclusion of any other court in order to avoid multiple legal proceedings such as are illustrated in this cause.
The record clearly reflects that the incompetent was a long-time resident of Palm Beach County and that the Palm Beach County Circuit Court, Probate Division, first accepted jurisdiction over the incompetent and his estate. All proceedings in the incompetency and guardianship cause should therefore be before the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida.
There is no conflict jurisdiction for this Court to consider this cause on petition for writ of certiorari, and said petition is denied. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is without merit and is hereby denied, with the parties being directed to proceed with all matters pertaining to the incompetency of said Kenneth P. Foster in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. . Art. V, § 3(b)(6), Fla.Const., F.S.A. . Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. . In re Mickder’s Guardianship, 163 So. 2d 257 (Fla.1964).
. State ex rel. Campbell v. Chapman, 145 Fla. 647, 1 So. 2d 278 (Fla.1941).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund OF the State of Fla. v. Mobil OIL Corp., 455 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…ch does have subject matter jurisdiction is free to exercise jurisdiction and to subsequently enter a final judgment. In Mabie, as well as in the various other eases cited by the Trustees where the rule of priority was employed, Benedict v. Foster, 300 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla.1974), Taylor v. Cooper, 60 So. 2d 534, 535-36 (Fla.1952), Ullendorff v. Brown 156 Fla. 655, 24 So. 2d 37, 39-40 (1945), Martinez v. Martinez, 153 Fla. 753,15 So. 2d 842 (1943), DiProspero v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co., 400 So. 2d 177, 179…
-
Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. FRY, 693 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…jurisdiction over the Fry Group’s action against the appellants, the historical law of Florida has been that the power to entertain the action attaches exclusively to that court which first exercised jurisdiction over the matter. Benedict v. Foster, 300 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla.1974); Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Gehl, 358 So. 2d 228, 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Hogan v. Millican, 209 So. 2d 716, 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968); Hunt v. Ganaway, 180 So. 2d 495, 496-97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), cert. denied, 188 So. 2d 806 (Fla.1966); B…
-
DiPROSPERO v. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. OF Shelby, 400 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…ut deciding that both courts had jurisdiction over the real estate, the court acting first should be held to have exclusive jurisdiction, and it was therefore proper to vacate the judgment in the DiProspero wrongful death action. Benedict v. Foster, 300 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1974). We thus affirm the order setting aside the final judgment in Case No. 76-8290. Case No. 80-232 is an appeal from an order on petition to intervene which also arises from the Doyle wrongful death action (Case No. 76-5343). We have here…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State ex rel. Val Campbell & Pluma Louise Palmer v. Forrest Chapman, 145 Fla. 647 (Fla. 1941)
- In re Guardianship OF Florence M. Mickler, 163 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1964)