STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
RAY D. SMITH, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certiorari Review cases and more on FLexlaw
ROBERTS, Justice.
This cause is before us on certiorari granted to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Smith v. State reported at 282 So. 2d 179 (Fla.App.1973) which directly conflicts with our recent decision in State v. Bryan, 287 So. 2d 73 (Fla.1973). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1973), F.S. A. On the authority of State v. Bryan, supra, which controls sub judice, the decision of the District Court is quashed, and, it appearing from the record before us that there may have been undisposed of questions at the level of the District Court which, therefore, did not reach here for review, the cause is remanded for further consideration and proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. A.C. Soud, Jr., 685 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…16 (Fla.1995); State ex rel. Wainwright v. Booth, 291 So. 2d 74, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA) (“Prohibition is to prevent a tribunal from taking action in excess of its power while certiorari is to remedy the consequent evils of such action”), cert. discharged, 300 So. 2d 257 (Fla.1974). Because the petition alleges that the respondent exceeded his jurisdiction when he issued the “administrative order,” we conclude that cer-tiorari is the appropriate remedy, and that we have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 4(b)(3), Fla. Const.;…
-
State v. Farmer, 384 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)…ee of guilt. Judge Gridley’s putative order of March 4,1980, was a material departure from the essential requirements of law. Certiorari is the proper remedy. See State ex rel. Wainwright v. Booth, 291 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. discharged, 300 So. 2d 257 (Fla.1974). In addition, the suggestion for writ of prohibition has affirmatively shown a lack of jurisdiction in the lower court. We find prohibition to be the proper remedy to prevent the lower court from taking further actions in excess of its p…
-
Kardel K. Snow v. State, 352 So. 3d 529 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)…plaining that certiorari review is proper when a trial court denies a motion to dismiss based on absolute litigation immunity).3 The Florida excess of its power while certiorari is to remedy the consequent evils of such action.”), cert. discharged, 300 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1974). 3 As stated above, orders denying some types of immunity from suit are now reviewable by interlocutory appeal. Cases permitting certiorari review of such orders predate the amendments to the rules of appellate procedure that permit inte…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Bryan, 287 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1973)
- Smith v. State, 282 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)