JIMMY WAYNE SMITH, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Lebowitz v. State, 313 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
  …ich first brought to the trial court’s attention the alleged contact between a juror and a witness) was filed untimely. Therefore, this matter has not been preserved for óur consideration on appeal at this time. See, Thompson v. State, Fla.App.1974, 300 So. 2d 301; Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1971, 250 So. 2d 308. We would observe that in order to set aside a jury verdict due to misconduct, the alleged misconduct must be shown to have influenced the verdict and to have caused injury to the complaining party. Ru…
• Lucious Boyd v. State, 200 So. 3d 685 (Fla. 2015)
  …he purpose of disqualifying a person who has a pending prosecution is to' avoid the possibility that that person might vote to convict in the hope of getting more favorable treatment from the prosecution in [his or her] own case.” Thompson v. State, 300 So. 2d 301, 303 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Conversely, persons who have already undergone . criminal prosecution and been convicted are no longer in a position to curry favor from the State. This is especially.true with regard to Juror Striggles since her last known…
• Cook v. State, 353 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
  …earing the court re-examined its earlier reversal of a defendant’s rape conviction, and in light of the harmless error doctrine of Harrington affirmed the conviction. See also Singleton v. State, 303 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Thompson v. State, 300 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). We have, however, only recently reversed a criminal conviction because of a Bruton violation. Russell v. State, 349 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Since we believe the harmless error doctrine is applicable here, it is, we feel,…

Authorities Cited

• Morgan Simpson v. State, 165 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
• Sparks v. State, 262 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
• Hyde v. United Am. Ins. Co., 205 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
• Gysin v. State, 205 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)