JAMES BAKER
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court denied James Baker's application for a writ of certiorari to review the denial of his request to apply for a writ of error coram nobis. The court found that Baker's contentions had already been decided against him and denied his application to stay execution.
No, the Florida Supreme Court denied James Baker's application. The court concluded that the issues raised by Baker had already been adjudicated adversely to his position.
“the matters presented and asserted have each been determined contrary to the views of counsel for the petitioner, and that the law and justice of the cause require that the application for an order staying the execution and judgment previously entered in this cause should be and the same is hereby denied.”
This quote explains the court's reasoning for denying the petitioner's application.
James Baker sought to apply to the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Florida Supreme Court's denial of his request to seek a w…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The petitioner, James Baker, represents that he desires to apply to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari for the purpose of reviewing the opinion and judgment of this Court denying an order permitting or allowing him to apply to the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida, for a writ of error coram nobis, and this Court having duly considered the merits of the several contentions made has reached the conclusion that the matters presented and asserted have each been determined contrary to the views of counsel for the petitioner, and that the law and justice of the cause require that the application for an order staying the execution and judgment previously entered in this cause should be and the same is hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.