ALBERT BANKS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Indigent Defendant'S Right To Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed a memorandum brief in support of his position, and on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. See §§ 901.15, 901.17, Fla.Stat. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Est. OF Encarnacion Luaces De Garcia v. Garcia, 399 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…whereas vested substantive rights remain unaffected and are determined by the law in effect at the time of death. See also In re Estate of Reed, 354 So. 2d 864 (Fla.1978); In re Estate of Rincon, 327 So. 2d 224 (Fla.1976); In re Estate of Geringer, 300 So. 2d 710 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 311 So. 2d 114 (Fla.1975); In re Roger’s Estate, 171 So. 2d 428 (Fla.2d DCA 1965). Encarnacion Luaces de Garcia died on February 21, 1979; thus the law in effect at the time of her death, the 1976 Florida Probate Cod…
-
In re Est. of Joan Schelb Geringer v. Goldman, 311 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1975)…Certiorari denied. 300 So. 2d 710. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.…
-
Phillips v. Hirshon, 958 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…D584, — So. 2d at - (setting forth requirements). The brothers have standing to make this argument because, unlike the decedent in Wartels, the decedent in this case died subsequent to the effective date of Chapter 719. See In re Estate of Geringer, 300 So. 2d 710, 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)(stating that probate is governed by law in effect at time of decedent’s death). Although at common law the term “real property” was deemed “co-extensive with lands, tenements, and hereditaments,” Ammerman, 222 So. 2d at 425,…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)