STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL., THE CRAGOR COMPANY, A CORPORATION,

v.

E. VANCE JONES, AS TAX ASSESSOR OF THE CITY OF LEESBURG, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• SUN Ins. Off. v. Clay, 133 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1961)
  …1 and Rule 4.61 has been generated by the language of this court in City of Dunedin v. Bense, Fla.1956, 90 So. 2d 300, at page 302, as follows: “The orbit within which the Supreme Court must function was well defined in State ex rel. Watson v. Lee, 150 Fla. 496, 8 So. 2d 19. We there held that jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is conferred by the Constitution itself. It is not endowed with any common-law prerogative outside of the boundaries established by organic law. Certainly, the appellate jurisdiction…
• State ex rel. Ayres v. Gray, 69 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1953)
  …ssness, of elections, convinced this Court that jurisdiction should be assumed by mandamus and that the issues implicit in the litigation were of the character entitling a lone citizen and taxpayer to apply for the writ. State ex rel. Watson v. Lee, 150 Fla. 496, 8 So. 2d 19. The relator was entitled to seek the writ. Although he was not entitled as a matter of right to secure what he sought, we decided, after careful study of the situation, to exercise our discretion in his favor so that the doubt, confus…
• Couse v. The Canal Auth. of the State of Fla., 209 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1968)
  …t of petitioner’s estimate of value.” . Art. V, Sec. 4, Fla.Const. . Robinson v. State, Fla.1961, 132 So. 2d 3. . Carmazi v. Board of County Commissioners, Fla.1958, 104 So. 2d 727; Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.1966, 183 So. 2d 193. . 150 Fla. 496, 8 So. 2d 19 (1942). See also Kilgore v. Bird, 149 Fla. 570, 6 So. 2d 541, and State ex rel. Peacock v. Latham, 125 Fla. 788, 170 So. 472. .“The Supreme Court, the circuit courts of appeal, and the district courts shall have power to issue all writ…