CHARLOTTE MAY MORRIS

v.

JOSEPH CARL MORRIS

Citator

Cited By

• Dohr v. Smith, 104 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 1958)
  …r to us that he and the anesthetist were working in highly expert fields peculiar to each and that despite the common goal, the successful repair of the patient’s ulcer, their responsibilities were not inextricably bound together. Hudson v. Weiland, 150 Fla. 523, 8 So. 2d 37. Out of justice to the surgeon we should say that contradictory of the impression gained from appellants’ presentation in the brief, that the surgeon was indifferent to the patient’s condition when she developed the cough, his depositi…
• Lawrence R. Grobman, M.D. v. Posey, 863 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …using a single injury.’ ” Id. at 486 (quoting Ass’n for Retarded Citizens-Volusia, Inc. v. Fletcher, 741 So. 2d 520, 529 n. 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (Harris, J., dissenting) (quoting Blaoic’s Law DICTIONARY 752-53 (5th ed.1979))). In Hudson v. Weiland, 150 Fla. 523, 8 So. 2d 37 (1942), [*1235] the supreme court described the joint and several liability of joint tortfeasors: [Wjhere the negligences of two or more persons concur in producing a single, indivisible injury, then such persons are jointly and severa…
• Dawson v. Wade S. Weems, M.D., 352 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
  …r to us that he and the anesthetist were working in highly expert fields peculiar to each and that despite the common goal, the successful repair of the patient’s ulcer, their responsibilities were not inextricably bound together. Hudson v. Weiland, 150 Fla. 523, 8 So. 2d 37.” 104 So. 2d at 32. Finally, we note that there is no expert testimony that Dr. Mizell’s care and treatment of Dawson fell below the required standard of care. All of those expressing an opinion on the subject (one of whom was the plai…