WENDELL L. KELLEY, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Bernhine W. Young v. State, 519 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
  …. See § 90.202, Fla.Stat. (1985). The lab reports were admissible at a probation revocation hearing without a chemist’s testimony. See Hayes v. State, 345 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 300 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1974); Singletary v. State, 290 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. dismissed, 293 So. 2d 361 (Fla.1974). Moreover, there was also testimony of a positive field-test of the cocaine and of Young’s representation during the sale that the substance…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Tuthill v. State, 518 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …l successfully pleaded at his first sentencing), Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1974), requires proof of a violation sufficient only to satisfy the conscience of the court. Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 300 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1974); see Lee v. State, 440 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). I cannot agree that every probation violation hearing4 should be rendered meaningless in determining the propriety of a departure and would hold, to the contrary, that a finding of vio…
• Riskin v. Miklos, 569 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …e defendants had appeared and litigated the issue in Ohio so that the Ohio judgment was entitled to res judicata effect in Florida. See Haas v. Haas, 59 So. 2d 640 (Fla.1952); Heritage Corp. v. Rivas, 289 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 300 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1974); see also Tipton v. Van Schouwen, 526 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Dusesoi v. Dusesoi, 498 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Baron v. Baron, 454 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). [*941] The record shows, however, that the only appearance in…