M. R. COGGIN AND A. DEERMONT, CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS AS COGGIN AND DEERMONT,

v.

VELMA MORRIS

Citator

Cited By

• N. Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1962)
  …ons of this court is the holding by the District Court that a mere abuse of the trial judge’s discretion is a sufficient basis for reversal of his ruling on the motion to vacate. In Coggin v. Barfield, 150 Fla. 551, 8 So. 2d 9, and Coggin v. Morris, 150 Fla. 555, 8 So. 2d 11, which were by implication relied on by the District Court as well as in Benedict v. W. T. Hadlow Co., 52 Fla. 188, 42 So. 239, this court held that a showing of gross abuse of a trial court’s discretion is necessary on appeal to justif…
• Glenna Somero and Robert Somero v. Hendry Gen. Hosp., 467 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …(1942), the supreme court held that the test was gross abuse of discretion and reversed the trial court’s entry of a default where a pleading was late for having been filed in the wrong court. The second case cited as authority was Coggin v. Morris, 150 Fla. 555, 8 So. 2d 11.(1942), and that court simply reversed on the authority of the first case. We deem it significant that North Shore involved an order of the trial court setting [*1105] aside a default rather than one refusing to do so. Subsequent cases…
• B. C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …a courts, i. e., that “it would be a gross abuse of discretion not to allow a defendant to present his defense if he had a meritorious one, was innocent of culpable negligence and willing to plead and to go to trial without delay.” Id. 150 Fla. 554, 8 So. 2d 11. See Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Wright, 342 So. 2d 503 (Fla.1977); North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla.1962); Waterson v. Seat and Crawford, 10 Fla. 326 (1863); County National Bank of North Miami Beach v. Sheridan, Inc., supra; Pe…