J. M. TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1974-09-30
No. 73-918
BOARDMAN, A. C. J., GRIMES, J., and BERANEK, JOHN RUSSELL, Associate Judge, concur.
301 So. 2d 28 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict of guilt for manslaughter by culpable negligence.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was found guilty of manslaughter by culpable negligence after a jury trial. The evidence showed an infant child was killed by a shotgun blas…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court granted appellant/defendant a belated full direct appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla. 1969, 229 So. 2d 239. A companion case, Fla.App., 295 So. 2d 387, was dismissed. After trial by jury appellant, J. M. Taylor, was found guilty of manslaughter by culpable negligence. He was adjudged guilty and sentenced to seven (7) years imprisonment and given credit for time spent in jail awaiting trial. Post-trial motions were filed and denied by the trial court. This appeal followed.

The principal question presented involves the contention of the appellant that the evidence adduced by the state at trial is insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.

After consideration of the record, briefs, including the several documents filed by appellant pro se, and oral arguments, we conclude that the jury had before it adequate competent evidence to uphold its verdict of guilt. In sum, the evidence shows that an infant child, whom appellant knew was present, was killed by a shotgun blast during an altercation following a drinking party.

The jury could have found from the evidence that appellant was in control of the shotgun at the critical time and, in light of the proven circumstances, that he was criminally negligent either in discharging the weapon that fired the fatal shot, or in causing it to be discharged.

We have considered the remaining points raised by appellant and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed is

Affirmed.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., GRIMES, J., and BERANEK, JOHN RUSSELL, Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw