CARRIGAN AND BOLAND, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

JAMES F. CASALE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dayton Tire & Rubber Co. v. Davis, 348 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …v. Fountainbleau Hotel Corp., 186 So. 2d 31 (Fla.3d DCA 1966); Holman v. Ford Mot. Co., supra; Mapp v. Cedars of Lebanon Hosp., Inc., 249 So. 2d 521 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Clark, 299 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. dism., 301 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1974); Burgin v. Merritt, supra n.1; Steele v. Royal Crown Cola Bottling Co., supra n.l; Lauck v. Publix Market, Inc., 335 So. 2d 589 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); Sharon v. Luten, supra. . 2 Harper and James, Law of Torts 1080-81 (1956). . Auto Specia…
• Turtle Lake Assocs., Ltd. v. Third Fin. Servs., Inc., 518 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …ppellants never admitted the authenticity or veracity of the alleged mortgages, the trial court erred in relying on the provisions of documents not in evidence. See Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Clark, 299 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. dismissed, 301 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1974). Third Financial presented no evidence showing that the value of the property is insufficient to secure the amount of the mortgages. We thus hold that Third Financial otherwise failed to carry its burden of showing entitlement to a recei…
• Bradford Motor Cars, Inc. v. Frem, 511 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …ppellant’s pleadings did not also strike appellant’s response to appel-lee’s request for admissions, as a response to a request for admissions is not a pleading. See Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. Clark, 299 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. dismissed, 301 So. 2d 100 (Fla.1974). Moreover, we conclude that the response to the request for admissions was not shown to be invalid, so it would have been improper to strike it. Further, even if the response to the request for admissions had been stricken, that would no…

Authorities Cited

• Casale v. Carrigan & Boland, Inc., 288 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)