ANDREW BROWN, SR.,
v.
COSMOPOLITAN ICE COMPANY, A CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Father sued ice company for wrongful death of his minor son based on violation of Florida's Child Labor Law. The trial court required amendment of the complaint to specify the child's age and applicable statutory provisions, and sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint. The court upheld the trial court's order granting compulsory amendment and sustaining the demurrer.
The trial court properly exercised its discretion in requiring amendment to clearly specify the minor's age and applicable statute sections, as the defendant was entitled to this information. The complaint as amended was properly dismissed, as the plaintiff must bring himself within the requirements of the Child Labor Act and be specific as to which sections apply.
“The matter of granting or denying a motion for compulsory amendment is one vested in the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown.”
Establishes the standard of review for compulsory amendment orders—trial court discretion is deferred to absent abuse.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe plaintiff, as father, brought a wrongful death action for his minor son. The son was employed by Cosmopolitan Ice Company driving a motor truck to…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
This writ of error is to two orders, the first granting a motion for compulsory amendment of plaintiff’s second amended declaration and the second sustaining a demurrer to the declaration as amended, being the third amended declaration.
Action was brought by the plaintiff in error as father for the wrongful death of a minor son, damages being predicated on a violation of certain provisions of Chapter 6488, Acts of 1913, later Section 4030 and Sections 4021, 4022, 4023, 4024, and 4025 Revised General Statutes of 1920.
The matter of granting or denying a motion for compulsory amendment is one vested in the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown. Holman v. Klutho, 91 Fla. 853, 109 So. 314. The second amended declaration was not definite as to the age of the minor and the sections of the statute relied on. Defendant was entitled to be apprised of these facts so there was no error on this point.
The sections of the Statute relied on for recovery are better known as the Child Labor Law, numerous sections of which prohibit the employment of minors under sixteen years of age in certain employments. The declaration should be specific as to the section or sections relied on and certainly the plaintiff must bring himself within the requirements of the act.
*601In this case, it appears that the deceased was driving a motor truck for the defendant in error delivering ice and that his death did not occur at the plant. If employment of minors in the business stated was prohibited by the act relied on, we do not imply that the circumstances under which deceased was alleged to have been killed were so remote from as to be unconnected with the main business.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., CHAPMAN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.