SAM ODOM, JR.,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
SAM ODOM, JR.,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
150 Fla. 686
Florida Supreme Court (1942)
Caution
Also reported at: 8 So. 2d 496
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Young v. State, 140 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1962)…They are not evidence of the truth of the allegations. Taylor v. State, 88 Fla. 555, 102 So. 884; Fogler v. State, 96 Fla. 68, 117 So. 694; Henderson v. State, 94 Fla. 318, 113 So. 689; Hayden v. State, 150 Fla. 789, 9 So. 2d 180;. Norris v. State, 150 Fla. 686, 8 So. 2d 493. Averments of motions for new trial are not self-supporting. White v. State, 121 Fla. 128, 163 So. 403; Hulst v. State, 123 Fla. 315, 166 So. 828; Holloman v. State, 140 Fla. 59, 191 So. 36. In Smith v. State, 57 Fla. 24, 48 So. 744,…
-
Singleton v. State, 183 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…self proving. The court is unable therefore to review the question.” To the same effect see Houghton v. State, Fla.App.1961, 133 So. 2d 111; Hulst v. State, 123 Fla. 315, 166 So. 828; Holloman v. State, 140 Fla. 59, 191 So. 36; and Norris v. State, 150 Fla. 686, 8 So. 2d 493. These cases involve attempts to raise the impropriety of alleged prejudicial remarks only by their bare and unsubstantiated inclusion in a Motion for New Trial. As to whether such comments may be considered when attested by affidavit…
-
Millard Keith v. State, 70 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1954)…Affirmed upon authority of Norris v. State, 150 Fla. 686, 8 So. 2d 493. ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON and DREW, TT-, concur.…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence