STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
CAPELETTI BROTHERS, INC., APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
CAPELETTI BROTHERS, INC., APPELLEE
301 So. 2d 804
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dade County v. Pepper, Fla.App.1964, 168 So. 2d 198 and Paul’s Drugs, Inc. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., Fla.App.1965, 175 So. 2d203.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCREADY v. McCREADY, 356 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)…DOWNEY, Judge. This dissolution of marriage suit proceeded to final judgment in August 1972. Being dissatisfied with that judgment, the wife appealed. This court reversed the judgment in an opinion published at 301 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). The primary basis for the reversal was that the trial court had attempted to effectuate a property settlement for the parties without authority to do so. We were concerned that the trial court’s attempted division of the propert…
-
Dirk-Jan Easterling v. Easterling, 358 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)…mobile home “as tenants in common with each of them owning an undivided one-half interest.” This was error. See Storer v. Storer, 353 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977); Palmer v. Palmer, 330 [*1115] So. 2d 839 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976); McCready v. McCready, 301 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). The tenor of all the above cited cases is to the effect that the court “cannot make a property settlement for the parties . [and] has no authority to transfer one spouse’s assets to another.” Palmer, supra, at p. 840. As to th…
Authorities Cited
- Dade Cnty. v. Pepper, 168 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)