HARDWARE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL.,
v.
MRS. RUBY CARLTON, WIDOW, AND AS NATURAL GUARDIAN OF DUANA CARLTON, A MINOR, ET AL.
HARDWARE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL.,
MRS. RUBY CARLTON, WIDOW, AND AS NATURAL GUARDIAN OF DUANA CARLTON, A MINOR, ET AL.
150 Fla. 729
Florida Supreme Court (1942)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 8 So. 2d 665
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
On appeal we review the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the Florida Industrial Commission in a case in which the Commission reversed the order of a deputy commissioner disallowing the claim.
There is ample evidence shown in the record to support the award of the Commission which was affirmed by the circuit court.
The judgment should be affirmed on authority of our opinions and judgments in the cases of Zee v. Gary, 137 Fla. 741, 189 So. 34; Cohen v. Sloan, 137 Fla. 335, 188 So. 331; Ocala Mfg. Ice and Packing Co. v. Preskitt, 136 Fla. 796, 187 So. 168.
So ordered.
BROWN, C. J„ WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thurston v. Morrison, 141 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…it constitutes no authority on this question. However, the writer also participated, on the losing side, in a subsequent case which arose in almost the same location as did the present one. This case is Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Carlton, 1942, 150 Fla. 729, 8 So. 2d 665, a workmen’s compensation case. In that case a per curiam decision of affirmance was rendered by our supreme court and so the facts will be gleaned from the record therein. In the Carlton case an outside salesman for a Tampa wholesale…
-
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Elec. Sys., Inc., 813 F. Supp. 802 (S.D. Fla. 1993)…then determined the employee to be within the scope of his employment as a matter of law. 292 F.Supp. at 110; see also Thurston v. Morrison, 141 So.2d 291, 295 (Fla. 2d Dist.Ct. App.1962) (citing Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. Carlton, 150 Fla. 729, 8 So.2d 665 (Fla.1942)) (accident while driving to business appointment is within scope of employment). The district court thereafter expressly characterized Doman as a general legal principle, writing: Further refinements of emplo…
Authorities Cited
- Zee v. Gary, 137 Fla. 741 (Fla. 1939)
- Cohen v. Sloan, 137 Fla. 335 (Fla. 1939)
- Ocala Mfg. Ice & Packing Co. v. Preskitt, 136 Fla. 796 (Fla. 1939)