EDNA B. PETTERSON AND JAMES H. PETTERSON, PETITIONERS,
v.
WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, INC., RESPONDENT
EDNA B. PETTERSON AND JAMES H. PETTERSON, PETITIONERS,
WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, INC., RESPONDENT
302 So. 2d 417
Florida Supreme Court (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari dismissed.
ADKINS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bliss v. Carmona, 418 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…5 (1934); Williams, Salomon, Kanner & Damian v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Florida, 379 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), aff’d after remand, 399 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Roberts v. Harkins, 292 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 302 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1974); Miller, Starr & Regalia, Subordination Agreements, 13 U.C.L.A. L. Rev. 1298, 1299 (1966). Under these circumstances, the seller may not be heard to complain. For these reasons, I would affirm.…
-
Inversiones Inmobiliarias Internacionales de Orlando Sociedad Anomina v. Barnett Bank OF Cent. Fla., N.A., 584 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…ender owes no duty to others to supervise the actual construction which it has financed. Napolitano v. Security First Federal Savings & Loan, 533 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). In Roberts v. Harkins, 292 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 302 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1974), the court held that an agreement between a prior mortgagee and the mortgagor that any subordination would be for construction purposes only was not binding on the later mortgagee who was not a party to such agreement and that the later m…