L. A. METCALF AND ALPHA METCALF, HIS WIFE,

v.

MARY OLA BARROW, A WIDOW, ERESS E. MATTHEWS, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, W. S. MATTHEWS, JULIA MITCHELL, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, JOHN F. MITCHELL, AND WALTON H. OWENS

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• McKIBBEN v. Mallory, 293 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1974)
  …und at common law in a bald repeal, without more. Rather, we interpret this as an indication of intent that existing rights under the old statute should survive.” See also: Chism v. Phelps, supra; Haddock v. Florida Motor Lines Corp., 150 Fla. 848, 9 So. 2d 98 (1942); 77 A.L.R. 1338; Shinners v. Royal Coal and Mining Co., 188 Ill.App. 335 (1914); Dance v. Martelli, 16 Ill.App.2d 122, 147 N.E. 2d 385 (1958). As expressed by the Legislature of Florida in Chapter 72-35, Laws of Florida, Section 768.17, the…
• Garner v. Ward, 251 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1971)
  …mother. Compare Powell v. Gessner, supra. The harsh result reached in Mock v. Evans Light & Ice Co., supra, as to Fla.Stat. § 768.03, F.S.A., was overruled in Haddock, for Use and Benefit of Wiggins v. Florida Motor Lines Corporation, 150 Fla. 848, 9 So. 2d 98 (1942). In this case, a minor child was killed. Although the father was living (but divorced), the mother brought suit. This Court stated: “It is insisted that the mother has no action because the statute places same only in the father. With this c…
• Eusebio M. Martinez v. Rodriquez, 215 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 1968)
  …tive. CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with Opinion. . F.S. Sec. 25.031, F.S.A.; Rule 4.61, Fla.App. Rules, 32 F.S.A. . Haddock, for Use and Benefit of Wiggins v. Florida Motor Lines Corp., 150 Fla. 848, 9 So. 2d 98; Covey v. Eppes, Fla.1963, 153 So. 2d 3; Burch v. Gilbert, Fla.App.1963, 148 So. 2d 289. See also cases collected 25A C.J.S. Death § 46 p. 713; 65A C.J.S. Negligence § 163, p. 209. . 83 So. 2d 587, 590. . “768.03 Parties in actions for death of mi…