JAMES WILLYERD, PETITIONER,
v.
ANDY ANDERSON AND LILA J. STEVENS, A/K/A L. J. ANDERSON, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1974-10-16
No. 45226
ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
302 So. 2d 750 Florida Supreme Court (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Chief Justice:

ADKINS, Chief Justice:

By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, (Willyerd v. Anderson, 291 So. 2d 137), which allegedly conflicts with the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Lafleur v. Castlewood International Corporation, 285 So. 2d 449. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Constitution, Article V, Section 3(b) (3), F.S.A. We have dispensed with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10, F.A.R. and on authority of our decision in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., 297 So. 2d 1, opinion filed June 19, 1974, the decision of the District Court of Appeal is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the District Court consider petitioner’s appeal on the merits.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD and OVERTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Willyerd v. Anderson, 312 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
    …es, Inc., Fla.App. 1973, 283 So. 2d 68 (rev’d, Fla.1974, 297 So. 2d 1). The Florida Supreme Court granted certiorari and quashed our decision, remanding the cause with directions to consider the appeal on the merits. Willyerd v. Anderson, Fla. 1974, 302 So. 2d 750. In September 1971 appellant/plaintiff, James Willyerd, filed suit against the appellees/defendants, Andy Anderson and Lila J. Stevens, also known as L. J. Anderson, for replevin and both compensatory and punitive damages. Process was duly served o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw