KENNETH LEONDRY ANGLIN, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Halifax Area Council ON Alcoholism v. City OF Daytona Beach, 385 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …ould be noted that in the instant case, the city has failed to show that any significant change in the use of the variance will result from Serenity House’s operation. See, e. g., City of Miami Beach v. Arlen King Cole Condominium Association, Inc., 302 So. 2d 777 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).…
• Lewis v. City OF Atl. Beach, 467 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …change. It is clear that the concept of grandfathered nonconforming use relates to the property and the use thereof, not to the type of ownership or leasehold interest in the property. City of Miami Beach v. Arlen King Cole Condominium Assn., Inc., 302 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The general rule is that [*755] nonconforming uses may be eliminated by attrition (amortization), abandonment, and acts of God as speedily as is consistent with proper safeguards and the rights of those persons affected. Bixler v…
• Hobbs v. Dep't OF Transp., 831 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
  …change. It is clear that the concept of grandfathered nonconforming use relates to the property and the use thereof, not to the type of ownership or leasehold interest in the property. City of Miami Beach v. Arlen King Cole Condominium Assn., Inc., 302 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Id. at 754 (emphasis added). The court in Lewis held that “the city illegally withheld certification that the nonconforming use of the premises could be continued by appellants under these circumstances.” Id. at 755. We conclude…

Authorities Cited

• Cooper v. State, 258 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
• Anglin v. State, 259 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)