MADISON LEE REYNOLDS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Reynolds appeals from an order summarily denying his post-conviction motion claiming his guilty pleas were involuntary due to mental incapacity. The court reversed and remanded, finding that psychiatric evaluations indicating incompetency at the time of plea, which were unknown to the trial judge and defense counsel, precluded summary denial.
The court held that the record was sufficient to preclude summary denial of Reynolds' post-conviction motion. Conviction of a legally incompetent person violates due process. The order was reversed and remanded for the trial court to either summarily deny the motion with record support or hold an evidentiary hearing.
[1] A conviction of a legally incompetent person violates due process.
[2] A trial court cannot summarily deny a motion for post-conviction relief when the record on appeal is sufficient to preclude such denial.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Conviction of a legally incompetent person violates due process.”
Establishes the fundamental legal principle underlying Reynolds' claim and the court's reasoning for reversal
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceReynolds pleaded guilty in Lake County to grand theft, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and obtaining property by worthless check. He was…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mental Incapacity cases and more on FLexlaw
SHARP, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order summarily denying Reynolds’ motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Reynolds entered guilty pleas in Lake County to the offenses of grand theft, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and obtaining property by worthless check. He now claims that these pleas were involuntary due to mental incapacity.
The record establishes that Reynolds was examined by two court appointed psychiatrists in Alachua County immediately prior to and immediately after he entered his pleas in Lake County. The psychiatrists’ written reports indicate he was not competent to stand trial during this period of time. However, it appears that neither the public defender who represented Reynolds, nor the trial judge in Lake County who accepted the pleas and sentenced Reynolds, had any knowledge of the psychiatric evaluations.
In our view, the record on appeal is sufficient enough to preclude the trial judge from summarily denying Reynolds’ claims. Conviction of a legally incompetent person violates due process. Alvord v. Wainwright, 725 F. 2d 1282 (11th Cir. 1984); Stinson v. Wainwright, 710 F. 2d 743 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 984, 104 S.Ct. 430, 78 L.Ed.2d 363 (1983).
Accordingly, the order is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court. On remand, the trial court may either summarily deny the motion and attach to its order portions of the record which conclusively show Reynolds is not entitled to relief, or hold an evidentiary hearing and then rule on Reynolds’ allegations. Wright v. State, 492 So. 2d 394, (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Simpson v. State, 479 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Rogers v. State, 467 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
UPCHURCH, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Alvord v. Louie L. Wainwright, 725 F.2d 1282 (11th Cir. 1984)
- Rogers v. State, 467 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Wright v. State, 492 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Prentiss Simpson v. State, 479 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Healy v. Maggio, 464 U.S. 984 (U.S. 1983)
- Robinson v. Warden, Md. State Penitentiary, 464 U.S. 984 (U.S. 1983)
- Stinson v. Louie L. Wainwright, 710 F.2d 743 (11th Cir. 1983)