FIRESTONE RUBBER COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
HOPE PARRISH, A MINOR, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
FIRESTONE RUBBER COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
HOPE PARRISH, A MINOR, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
303 So. 2d 380
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive System, Inc., Fla. 1950, 48 So. 2d 82; Crane v. Simpson, Fla.App.1968, 213 So. 2d 299; Holman v. Ford Motor Company, Fla.App.1970, 239 So. 2d 40; Bill Kelley Chevrolet, Inc. v. Kerr, Fla.App.1972, 258 So. 2d 280; Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. McKelvey, Fla.App.1972, 259 So. 2d 777; Potashnick-Badgett Dredging, Incorporated v. Whitfield, Fla.App. 1972, 269 So. 2d 36; Nelson v. Ford Motor Company, 5th Cir. 1972, 469 F. 2d 261.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Crain & Crouse, Inc. v. Palm BAY Towers Corp., 326 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 1976)…ENGLAND, Justice. By petition for a writ of certiorari, we are requested to review a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal reported at 303 So. 2d 380. Our jurisdiction is invoked on the basis of direct conflict between the district court’s decision and that in Exchange Bank v. Florida Nat’l Bank, 292 So. 2d 361 (Fla.1974), as well as other cases. Petitioner suggests that the district court below…
-
Herschel Shepard v. City OF Palatka & Joseph Rothenberg & United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 414 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…dgment as a matter of law. Every reasonable inference was required to be drawn in favor of Shepard. Wills v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 351 So. 2d 29 (Fla.1977); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966). In Palm Bay Towers Corp. v. Crain & Crouse, Inc., 303 So. 2d 380, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), the court enunciated the standard of care owed by an architect to his employer: As a general rule, an engineer, like an architect, owes his employer a duty to exercise and apply his professional skill, ability and judgment…
-
Palm BAY Towers Corp. v. Crain & Crouse, Inc., 326 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered in this cause on October 29, 1974 (303 So. 2d 380) affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive Sys., 48 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1950)
- Holman v. Ford Motor Co., 239 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)
- Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. McKELVEY, 259 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- State v. Joseph, 269 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
- Potashnick-Badgett Dredging Inc. v. Whitfield, 269 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
- Booker T. Wright v. State, 258 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
- Bill Kelley Chevrolet, Inc. v. Kerr, 258 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Crane v. Simpson, 213 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
- Nelson v. Ford Motor Co., 469 F.2d 261 (5th Cir. 1972)