HARVEY FAIRBANKS AND EMILY A. FAIRBANKS, HIS WIFE,
v.
G. G. ROBERTSON, ET AL.
HARVEY FAIRBANKS AND EMILY A. FAIRBANKS, HIS WIFE,
G. G. ROBERTSON, ET AL.
151 Fla. 224
Florida Supreme Court (1942)
Caution
Also reported at: 9 So. 2d 369
Cited by 25 cases
Opinion of the Court
The record and the briefs in this case have been examined. It involves a controversy as to priority between State and County tax certificate and Municipal tax certificate holders. A full statement of the case and discussion of the questions raised would require a long opinion that would serve no useful purpose. We find no reason to reverse the chancellor so the decree appealed from is affirmed. ■
*225Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
Nelson v. Ziegler, 89 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1956)…[*784] DREW, Chief Justice (concurring specially). In Williams v. Sauls, 151 Fla. 270, 9 So. 2d 369, 371, we reversed because of the failure of the trial court to charge the jury on the doctrine of the last clear chance. There the plaintiff’s husband was killed when struck by a truck driven by the defendant. That the deceased was negligent on ente…
-
Marlon A. James and Donald v. James, 133 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 1961)…portunity to avoid injuring the plaintiff and thereafter she failed to exercise such a standard of care. Rosenfeld v. Knowlton, supra; Hodell v. Snyder, supra; Lindsay v. Thomas, supra, and Springer v. Morris, supra; Williams v. Sauls, 151 Fla. 270, 9 So. 2d 369. It should be recalled that there was no dispute as to the visibility of the pedestrian for a distance of several hundred feet prior to the impact. Nelson v. Ziegler, Fla., 89 So. 2d 780; Hodell v. Snyder, supra; Wawner v. Sellic Stone Studio, Fla.…
-
LEE Cnty. OIL Co., Inc. v. Marshall, 98 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957)…Home, La.App.1953, 68 So. 2d 626; Bryan v. City of Chicago, 371 Ill. 64, 20 N.E. 2d 37. . Merchants Transportation Oo. v. Daniel, supra; Panama City Transit Company v. Du Vernoy, 159 Fla. 890, 33 So. 2d 48. . See: Williams v. Sauls, 151 Fla. 270, 9 So. 2d 369, 371, wherein the Supreme Court of Florida reaffirmed the proposition that “ * * * each party has a right to have the jury instructed on his theory of the case, when * * * there is substantial evidence to support his or her contention.” (Emphasis ou…
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence